A Study of Academic Search Scenarios and Information Seeking Behaviour

O. Hoeber, Dolinkumar Patel, D. Storie
{"title":"A Study of Academic Search Scenarios and Information Seeking Behaviour","authors":"O. Hoeber, Dolinkumar Patel, D. Storie","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important contribution in the development of interactive information retrieval as a research discipline has been the specification of information seeking models. A variety of such models have been documented, some of which apply generally to a broad set of search settings, and others which are specific to settings such as academic search. Within the domain of academic search, it is unclear to what extent searchers employ the strategies specified in such models when faced with different types of information needs (ranging from fact verification to knowledge discovery). Using an online questionnaire that presented four different academic search scenarios, we collected data on the self-reported likelihood of researchers (professors, graduate students) to use specific strategies from each of five different information seeking models. Preliminary analysis of data from a pilot study (n=10) has revealed differences in which of the strategies are employed depending on the type of search scenario as well as the level of expertise of the searcher.","PeriodicalId":187771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

An important contribution in the development of interactive information retrieval as a research discipline has been the specification of information seeking models. A variety of such models have been documented, some of which apply generally to a broad set of search settings, and others which are specific to settings such as academic search. Within the domain of academic search, it is unclear to what extent searchers employ the strategies specified in such models when faced with different types of information needs (ranging from fact verification to knowledge discovery). Using an online questionnaire that presented four different academic search scenarios, we collected data on the self-reported likelihood of researchers (professors, graduate students) to use specific strategies from each of five different information seeking models. Preliminary analysis of data from a pilot study (n=10) has revealed differences in which of the strategies are employed depending on the type of search scenario as well as the level of expertise of the searcher.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术搜索情境与信息搜寻行为研究
在交互式信息检索作为一门研究学科的发展中,一个重要的贡献是信息查找模型的规范。已经记录了各种这样的模型,其中一些通常适用于广泛的搜索设置,而另一些则特定于诸如学术搜索之类的设置。在学术搜索领域,当面对不同类型的信息需求(从事实验证到知识发现)时,搜索者在多大程度上使用这些模型中指定的策略是不清楚的。我们使用一份在线问卷,展示了四种不同的学术搜索场景,收集了研究人员(教授、研究生)使用五种不同信息搜索模型中每种特定策略的自我报告可能性的数据。对一项试点研究(n=10)数据的初步分析显示,根据搜索情景的类型以及搜索者的专业知识水平,所采用的策略有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assisting Health Consumers While Searching the Web through Medical Annotations Do Metrics Matter? Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities NotifyMeHere: Intelligent Notification Delivery in Multi-Device Environments Computational Surprise, Perceptual Surprise, and Personal Background in Text Understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1