The “China Shock” Revisited

A. Jakubik, Victor Stolzenburg
{"title":"The “China Shock” Revisited","authors":"A. Jakubik, Victor Stolzenburg","doi":"10.30875/CBF82ACD-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We exploit a decomposition of gross trade flows into their value added components to reassess the relationship between increased imports from China and manufacturing jobs in US local labour markets following the seminal paper of Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (2013, ADH). Decomposed trade flows enable us to address identification and measurement issues inherent to gross trade data. In particular, it allows us to remove US value added in Chinese exports from the exposure measure which is mechanically correlated with the dependent variable and overstates the volume of the trade shock. In addition, the decomposition permits to correct for double counting, to remove primary and services inputs in manufacturing exports, and to assign competition to the upstream industry that supplied the value added rather than the final exporting industry. This further reduces the volume of the shock and improves the accuracy of the import exposure measure. Consequently, we find considerable differences in the pattern of regions that are most affected by the trade shock and show that imports from China can explain less of the decline in US manufacturing than what gross trade data would suggest. We then separate the shock into a China-driven domestic reform and a thirdcountry-driven value chain component, and find in line with ADH that the smaller, but still negative labour market effects are indeed China driven. Finally, we observe that the negative effects identified in ADH are not present in the 2008-2014 period, as labour market adjustment has largely concluded. The long time needed for adjustment may have been prolonged by the evolution of China's comparative advantage.","PeriodicalId":178903,"journal":{"name":"WTO Working Papers","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WTO Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30875/CBF82ACD-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We exploit a decomposition of gross trade flows into their value added components to reassess the relationship between increased imports from China and manufacturing jobs in US local labour markets following the seminal paper of Autor, Dorn, and Hanson (2013, ADH). Decomposed trade flows enable us to address identification and measurement issues inherent to gross trade data. In particular, it allows us to remove US value added in Chinese exports from the exposure measure which is mechanically correlated with the dependent variable and overstates the volume of the trade shock. In addition, the decomposition permits to correct for double counting, to remove primary and services inputs in manufacturing exports, and to assign competition to the upstream industry that supplied the value added rather than the final exporting industry. This further reduces the volume of the shock and improves the accuracy of the import exposure measure. Consequently, we find considerable differences in the pattern of regions that are most affected by the trade shock and show that imports from China can explain less of the decline in US manufacturing than what gross trade data would suggest. We then separate the shock into a China-driven domestic reform and a thirdcountry-driven value chain component, and find in line with ADH that the smaller, but still negative labour market effects are indeed China driven. Finally, we observe that the negative effects identified in ADH are not present in the 2008-2014 period, as labour market adjustment has largely concluded. The long time needed for adjustment may have been prolonged by the evolution of China's comparative advantage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“中国冲击”重现
根据Autor, Dorn和Hanson (2013, ADH)的开创性论文,我们利用贸易总额分解为其增值部分来重新评估从中国进口增加与美国当地劳动力市场制造业就业之间的关系。分解的贸易流使我们能够处理总贸易数据固有的识别和度量问题。特别是,它允许我们将中国出口的美国增加值从风险度量中剔除,这与因变量机械相关,并夸大了贸易冲击的规模。此外,分解允许纠正重复计算,消除制造业出口中的初级和服务投入,并将竞争分配给提供增值的上游产业,而不是最终出口产业。这进一步减少了冲击的体积,提高了进口暴露测量的准确性。因此,我们发现受贸易冲击影响最大的地区的模式存在相当大的差异,并表明,与贸易总额数据所显示的相比,来自中国的进口对美国制造业下滑的解释更少。然后,我们将冲击分为中国驱动的国内改革和第三国驱动的价值链部分,并发现与ADH一致,较小但仍然是负面的劳动力市场影响确实是中国驱动的。最后,我们观察到,在2008-2014年期间,由于劳动力市场调整基本上已经结束,ADH中确定的负面影响并不存在。调整所需的漫长时间可能因中国比较优势的演变而延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trade and Welfare Effects of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement How will global trade patterns evolve in the long run? A Novel Framework to Evaluate Changes in Access to and Costs of Trade Finance Trade policy implications of a changing world Means of Liberalization and Beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1