Static and Dynamic Balance in Adults Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: Screening and Prediction of Postsurgical Outcomes.

Anat V. Lubetzky, A. Soroka, D. Harel, T. Errico, J. Bendo, J. Leitner, S. Shabat, Eli Ashkenazi, Y. Floman, M. Moffat, Y. Masharawi
{"title":"Static and Dynamic Balance in Adults Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery: Screening and Prediction of Postsurgical Outcomes.","authors":"Anat V. Lubetzky, A. Soroka, D. Harel, T. Errico, J. Bendo, J. Leitner, S. Shabat, Eli Ashkenazi, Y. Floman, M. Moffat, Y. Masharawi","doi":"10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nBalance and fall risk before and after lumbar surgery was assessed to determine whether balance at baseline predicts long-term postsurgical outcomes.\n\n\nMETHODS\nForty-three patients in the United States and Israel performed the single-leg stance (SLS) test, four square step test (FSST), and 8-foot up-and-go (8FUG) test before and 2 to 4 months after lumbar spine surgery. They completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain rating before and 12 months after lumbar surgery.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFrom baseline to follow-up, the SLS time was 3.74 seconds longer (P = 0.01), the FSST time was 1.94 seconds faster (P < 0.001), and the 8FUG time was 1.55 seconds faster (P = 0.02). Before surgery, 26% of the patients were considered high fall risk according to the FSST and 51% according to the 8FUG. Postsurgery, all patients could complete the physical tests, but 26% remained at high fall risk according to the 8FUG and 7.5% according to the FSST. The three physical measures together explained 30% of the variance in postsurgical ODI scores (P = 0.02). Age was not correlated with performance.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nRisk of falling is higher than surgeons suspect. Balance tests (ie, SLS, FSST, and 8FUG) are quick and easy to administer. The findings support the importance of screening for balance and fall risk in adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Balance and fall risk before and after lumbar surgery was assessed to determine whether balance at baseline predicts long-term postsurgical outcomes. METHODS Forty-three patients in the United States and Israel performed the single-leg stance (SLS) test, four square step test (FSST), and 8-foot up-and-go (8FUG) test before and 2 to 4 months after lumbar spine surgery. They completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and pain rating before and 12 months after lumbar surgery. RESULTS From baseline to follow-up, the SLS time was 3.74 seconds longer (P = 0.01), the FSST time was 1.94 seconds faster (P < 0.001), and the 8FUG time was 1.55 seconds faster (P = 0.02). Before surgery, 26% of the patients were considered high fall risk according to the FSST and 51% according to the 8FUG. Postsurgery, all patients could complete the physical tests, but 26% remained at high fall risk according to the 8FUG and 7.5% according to the FSST. The three physical measures together explained 30% of the variance in postsurgical ODI scores (P = 0.02). Age was not correlated with performance. DISCUSSION Risk of falling is higher than surgeons suspect. Balance tests (ie, SLS, FSST, and 8FUG) are quick and easy to administer. The findings support the importance of screening for balance and fall risk in adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人腰椎手术的静态和动态平衡:术后结果的筛选和预测。
评估腰椎手术前后的平衡和跌倒风险,以确定基线平衡是否能预测术后长期预后。方法43例美国和以色列患者在腰椎手术前和术后2 ~ 4个月分别进行单腿站立(SLS)试验、4平方步试验(FSST)和8英尺起落(8FUG)试验。他们在腰椎手术前和手术后12个月完成了Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和疼痛评分。结果从基线到随访,SLS时间延长了3.74 s (P = 0.01), FSST时间缩短了1.94 s (P < 0.001), 8FUG时间缩短了1.55 s (P = 0.02)。术前,26%的患者根据FSST和51%的患者根据8FUG被认为是高跌倒风险。术后,所有患者均可完成体格检查,但根据8FUG和FSST,仍有26%和7.5%的患者存在高跌倒风险。三种物理测量加起来解释了30%的术后ODI评分差异(P = 0.02)。年龄与表现无关。跌倒的风险比外科医生想象的要高。平衡测试(即SLS, FSST和8FUG)快速且易于管理。研究结果支持了在接受腰椎手术的成年人中进行平衡和跌倒风险筛查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cemented Implants Placed During Initial TKA on Surgical Time and Expenses in Revision TKA. Cannabis Use Disorder Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Hydrogen Peroxide May Reduce the Risk for Revision Surgery and Infection in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty: Two-year Follow-up From a Prospective, Blinded, Controlled Trial. Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Evaluation of Preoperative Variables that Improve the Predictive Accuracy of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1