Telehealth vs Face to Face Pediatric Screenings: A Pilot Study

Katherine S. Ryan-Bloomer, J. Z. Delahunt
{"title":"Telehealth vs Face to Face Pediatric Screenings: A Pilot Study","authors":"Katherine S. Ryan-Bloomer, J. Z. Delahunt","doi":"10.26681/jote.2022.060108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global pandemic heightened the importance of occupational therapy (OT) education programs to prepare students for telehealth practice. The objective was to examine the following research questions: 1. Does self-assessment of pediatric competency skills improve following participation in pediatric screenings? 2. Is there a difference in self-assessment of pediatric competency skills between those students who perform pediatric screenings via telehealth versus face-to-face? 3. What is the lived experience for students who perform telehealth and face-to-face pediatric screenings? A mixed methodquasi-experimental design and phenomenological tradition were employed. The study utilized online surveys, focus groups, telehealth screenings with an urban preschool, and face-to-face screenings at a Christian suburban preschool in the Midwest. Participants included forty-nine first year, Master of OT students at a private university. Students performed screenings using the ASQ-3 via telehealth or face-toface formats. Outcomes measures included: Self-Assessment of CompetencyPediatric Screening (SACPS) survey, Pediatric Screening Experience Survey, and Focus Group Semi-Structured Interview Questions. No statistically significant differences were found on SAC-PS scores between formats, F (11, 49) = .661, p = .76, Ꞃ2 = .17. Post-screening scores were statistically significantly higher (M =48.95, SD = 4.02) than pre-screening (M =43.58, SD =4.69) for all students, F (11,49) = 36, p2= .58. Improvements from pre-to post-pediatric screenings were found for ten of eleven questions at the p","PeriodicalId":304291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Therapy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2022.060108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The global pandemic heightened the importance of occupational therapy (OT) education programs to prepare students for telehealth practice. The objective was to examine the following research questions: 1. Does self-assessment of pediatric competency skills improve following participation in pediatric screenings? 2. Is there a difference in self-assessment of pediatric competency skills between those students who perform pediatric screenings via telehealth versus face-to-face? 3. What is the lived experience for students who perform telehealth and face-to-face pediatric screenings? A mixed methodquasi-experimental design and phenomenological tradition were employed. The study utilized online surveys, focus groups, telehealth screenings with an urban preschool, and face-to-face screenings at a Christian suburban preschool in the Midwest. Participants included forty-nine first year, Master of OT students at a private university. Students performed screenings using the ASQ-3 via telehealth or face-toface formats. Outcomes measures included: Self-Assessment of CompetencyPediatric Screening (SACPS) survey, Pediatric Screening Experience Survey, and Focus Group Semi-Structured Interview Questions. No statistically significant differences were found on SAC-PS scores between formats, F (11, 49) = .661, p = .76, Ꞃ2 = .17. Post-screening scores were statistically significantly higher (M =48.95, SD = 4.02) than pre-screening (M =43.58, SD =4.69) for all students, F (11,49) = 36, p2= .58. Improvements from pre-to post-pediatric screenings were found for ten of eleven questions at the p
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程医疗与面对面儿科筛查:一项试点研究
全球大流行强调了职业治疗(OT)教育计划为学生准备远程医疗实践的重要性。目的是检查以下研究问题:1。参与儿科筛查后,儿童能力技能的自我评估是否有所改善?2. 那些通过远程医疗和面对面进行儿科筛查的学生在儿科能力技能的自我评估上有差异吗?3.进行远程医疗和面对面儿科筛查的学生的生活经验是什么?采用准实验设计和现象学传统的混合方法。该研究利用了在线调查、焦点小组、城市学前班的远程医疗筛查,以及中西部郊区基督教学前班的面对面筛查。参与者包括49名私立大学OT硕士一年级学生。学生通过远程医疗或面对面的形式使用ASQ-3进行筛查。结果测量包括:儿童筛查能力自我评估(SACPS)调查、儿童筛查经验调查和焦点小组半结构化访谈问题。两种格式的SAC-PS评分差异无统计学意义,F (11,49) = 0.661, p = 0.76,Ꞃ2 = 0.17。所有学生筛查后得分均显著高于筛查前得分(M =48.95, SD = 4.02), F (11,49) = 36, p2= 0.58。研究发现,在11个问题中,有10个问题从儿科前筛查到儿科后筛查有所改善
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Communication and Collaboration Among Healthcare Students Experiential Education in Advocacy for Occupational Therapy Students: Didactic Approaches and Learning Outcomes A Framework for Creating and Using Teaching Philosophy Statements to Guide Reflective and Inclusive Instruction Using a Flipped Classroom to Teach Evidence-Based Practice to Entry-Level Occupational Therapy Students Stress, Mindfulness and Occupational Engagement: A Pilot Study of the HOME Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1