A Comparative Analysis of Electricity Regulatory Frameworks in Nigeria and South Africa

D. Akabuiro
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Electricity Regulatory Frameworks in Nigeria and South Africa","authors":"D. Akabuiro","doi":"10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Africa is tagged the ‘Dark Continent’. As seen by some analysts, the concept of ‘dark continent’ is a symbolic representation of Africa’s underdevelopment on the one hand and its inability to generate enough electricity necessary for economic and human development on the other hand. The need for a decentralized electricity regulatory framework vis-à-vis effective regulatory institutions in improving power generation and supply cannot be overemphasized. Thus, the failure of most Sub-Sahara African (SSA) countries to significantly improve their power sector could be blamed on non grass-root oriented and non-inclusive electricity regulatory models. South Africa runs a decentralized electricity regulatory model which is highly contributory to her relatively high rate of electricity access. The objectives of this work are to attempt a comparative analysis between South African (SA) and Nigeria’s regulatory power sector frameworks and to understand the impacts of SA’s regulatory frameworks on its power generation with the view to drawing lessons for Nigeria. The major argument of this paper is that SA’s decentralized electricity regulatory model is highly contributory to the country’s power sector performance as against Nigeria’s centralized model with has dwindled its power sector performance. This paper examines the existing regulatory frameworks of both Nigeria and South Africa, their impacts on the various aspects of power sector. The paper also identifies salient lessons for Nigeria from SA experience and makes other recommendations that could improve Nigeria’s power sector regulatory regime and overall performance of the sector.","PeriodicalId":326636,"journal":{"name":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nigerian Juridical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56284/tnjr.v16i1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Africa is tagged the ‘Dark Continent’. As seen by some analysts, the concept of ‘dark continent’ is a symbolic representation of Africa’s underdevelopment on the one hand and its inability to generate enough electricity necessary for economic and human development on the other hand. The need for a decentralized electricity regulatory framework vis-à-vis effective regulatory institutions in improving power generation and supply cannot be overemphasized. Thus, the failure of most Sub-Sahara African (SSA) countries to significantly improve their power sector could be blamed on non grass-root oriented and non-inclusive electricity regulatory models. South Africa runs a decentralized electricity regulatory model which is highly contributory to her relatively high rate of electricity access. The objectives of this work are to attempt a comparative analysis between South African (SA) and Nigeria’s regulatory power sector frameworks and to understand the impacts of SA’s regulatory frameworks on its power generation with the view to drawing lessons for Nigeria. The major argument of this paper is that SA’s decentralized electricity regulatory model is highly contributory to the country’s power sector performance as against Nigeria’s centralized model with has dwindled its power sector performance. This paper examines the existing regulatory frameworks of both Nigeria and South Africa, their impacts on the various aspects of power sector. The paper also identifies salient lessons for Nigeria from SA experience and makes other recommendations that could improve Nigeria’s power sector regulatory regime and overall performance of the sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚和南非电力监管框架的比较分析
非洲被称为“黑暗大陆”。在一些分析人士看来,“黑暗大陆”的概念一方面象征着非洲的不发达,另一方面象征着非洲无法为经济和人类发展提供足够的电力。需要一个分散的电力管理框架,以便-à-vis有效的管理机构改善发电和供应,这一点怎么强调都不为过。因此,大多数撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)国家未能显著改善其电力部门,可归咎于非面向基层和非包容性的电力监管模式。南非实行分散的电力监管模式,这对其相对较高的电力接入率有很大贡献。这项工作的目的是尝试比较分析南非(SA)和尼日利亚的电力部门监管框架,并了解南非的监管框架对其发电的影响,以期为尼日利亚吸取教训。本文的主要论点是,与尼日利亚的集中式电力监管模式相比,南非的分散式电力监管模式对该国电力部门的绩效贡献很大,而尼日利亚的集中式电力监管模式却降低了其电力部门的绩效。本文考察了尼日利亚和南非现有的监管框架,以及它们对电力部门各个方面的影响。本文还从南非的经验中确定了尼日利亚的重要经验教训,并提出了其他建议,可以改善尼日利亚电力部门的监管制度和该部门的整体绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Climate Change Regime in Maintaining Internal Security in Nigeria Dysfunctional Nigerian Insurance Industry: Failure of Law or Regulation? Protection of Traditional Knowledge and its Relevance to National Economic Growth and Development in Nigeria Primary Health Care Approach to Achieving Universal Health Coverage in Nigeria: Are Extant Legal and Policy Regimes Adequate? Impact of the Public Procurement Act 2007 on the Functions of Governing Councils of Federal Universities in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1