Remembering Gwangju: Memory Work in the South Korean Democracy Movement, 1980–1987

Soonyawl Park
{"title":"Remembering Gwangju: Memory Work in the South Korean Democracy Movement, 1980–1987","authors":"Soonyawl Park","doi":"10.1108/S0163-786X20210000045011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prodemocracy protest in South Korea in the 1980s can be described in terms of two waves of sustained activism between 1979 and 1987. One wave was brutally repressed in the Gwangju Uprising of May 1980, while the other succeeded in bringing in a transition to democracy in June 1987. How did activists recover from the repression in the first wave, and how did they create a viable movement in the second wave? This work focuses on the role of memory work about the Gwangju Uprising in the mobilization of the prodemocracy movement. Drawing on a wide assortment of documents collected from various archives in South Korea, the author demonstrates how memory work contributed to the movement dynamics. Cognitively, memory work radicalized movement participants such that they became completely disillusioned with the legitimacy of state power. Emotionally, memory work triggered a moral shock among recruits that motivated them to take the high risks associated with activism. Relationally, memory work provided a bonding experience for activists within a network. The findings also show a process through which memory work becomes a powerful social force: emergence of a challenger, proliferation of an alternative narrative, and then a full-blown contention between the state and a challenger. The process also means changes of the status of memory in terms of ownership, salience, and valence.","PeriodicalId":167211,"journal":{"name":"Four Dead in Ohio","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Four Dead in Ohio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20210000045011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prodemocracy protest in South Korea in the 1980s can be described in terms of two waves of sustained activism between 1979 and 1987. One wave was brutally repressed in the Gwangju Uprising of May 1980, while the other succeeded in bringing in a transition to democracy in June 1987. How did activists recover from the repression in the first wave, and how did they create a viable movement in the second wave? This work focuses on the role of memory work about the Gwangju Uprising in the mobilization of the prodemocracy movement. Drawing on a wide assortment of documents collected from various archives in South Korea, the author demonstrates how memory work contributed to the movement dynamics. Cognitively, memory work radicalized movement participants such that they became completely disillusioned with the legitimacy of state power. Emotionally, memory work triggered a moral shock among recruits that motivated them to take the high risks associated with activism. Relationally, memory work provided a bonding experience for activists within a network. The findings also show a process through which memory work becomes a powerful social force: emergence of a challenger, proliferation of an alternative narrative, and then a full-blown contention between the state and a challenger. The process also means changes of the status of memory in terms of ownership, salience, and valence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铭记光州:韩国民主运动中的记忆工作,1980-1987
20世纪80年代韩国的民主抗议活动可以用1979年至1987年的两波持续的激进主义来描述。一波在1980年5月的光州起义中被残酷镇压,另一波在1987年6月成功地实现了向民主主义的过渡。活动家们是如何从第一波镇压中恢复过来的?他们又是如何在第二波中创造一个可行的运动的?这部作品主要是关于光州起义的记忆工作在民主化运动动员中的作用。作者从韩国的各种档案中收集了各种各样的文件,展示了记忆工作如何促成运动动态。在认知上,记忆工作使运动参与者变得激进,以至于他们对国家权力的合法性彻底失望。从情感上讲,记忆工作在新兵中引发了道德冲击,激励他们承担与行动主义相关的高风险。从关系上讲,记忆工作为网络中的积极分子提供了一种联系经验。研究结果还显示了一个记忆工作成为强大社会力量的过程:挑战者的出现,替代叙事的扩散,然后是国家与挑战者之间全面的争论。这个过程也意味着记忆在所有权、显著性和效价方面的地位的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
To Thread the Conscience: Michigan State University and the Anti-apartheid Movement Index Talking with or Talking at Young Activists? Mediated Youth Engagement in Web-accessible Spaces The Ukrainian Revolution: Repression, Interpretation, and Dissent The Morphology of Repression: Dialectics between Chilean Students and State Force Actions 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1