Inclusive education in the discourse of hypocrisy

{"title":"Inclusive education in the discourse of hypocrisy","authors":"","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.3426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the problems of assumptions of inclusive education. Some of the assumptions appear hypocritical, where declarations of inclusion are accompanied by an exclusionary discourse. These discourses are analyzed in the light of the development of the theory of special education and in the actions of educational officials and politicians. Particular attention was paid to the Education for All project. The author points out that this project, despite valuable declarations, contains in the executive part a traditional, clinical image of person with disabilities. This image is not conductive to the inclusion of children in joint education.","PeriodicalId":147535,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the problems of assumptions of inclusive education. Some of the assumptions appear hypocritical, where declarations of inclusion are accompanied by an exclusionary discourse. These discourses are analyzed in the light of the development of the theory of special education and in the actions of educational officials and politicians. Particular attention was paid to the Education for All project. The author points out that this project, despite valuable declarations, contains in the executive part a traditional, clinical image of person with disabilities. This image is not conductive to the inclusion of children in joint education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全纳教育话语中的虚伪
本文提出了全纳教育的假设问题。其中一些假设显得虚伪,其中包含的声明伴随着排斥性的话语。这些话语是根据特殊教育理论的发展和教育官员和政治家的行动来分析的。特别注意了全民教育项目。作者指出,这个项目,尽管有价值的宣言,在执行部分包含一个传统的,临床的残疾人形象。这种形象不利于将儿童纳入联合教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preliminary identification of the potential of using MIEM in the context of stimulating the development of selected cognitive processes of students in early childhood education University student’s internalising problems in the context of mental support in Poland – a Latent Profile Analysis Selected aspects of perceptions of critical thinking among Polish and Czech primary school principals Children’s participation in research: tensions and dilemmas around ethical practice Models of classroom discipline – teachers’ preferences and their selected predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1