A Chinese 300MWe Two-Loop PWR NPP LBLOCA Analysis Based on the Deterministic Realistic Hybrid Methodology

Yuhan Li, B. Kuang
{"title":"A Chinese 300MWe Two-Loop PWR NPP LBLOCA Analysis Based on the Deterministic Realistic Hybrid Methodology","authors":"Yuhan Li, B. Kuang","doi":"10.1115/icone29-92431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is among the important limiting design basis accidents for a PWR nuclear power plant (NPP). In China, a 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP, although facing the challenge of life extension, still adopted rather conservative tools and methods for safety analysis. This is supposed to have guaranteed sufficient margin for safe operation of the plant during the past years, yet, at the expense of plant economy and operation flexibility. To evaluate the safety margin more reasonably and realistically, the mixed methodology of DRHM (deterministic realistic hybrid methodology) is introduced for LBLOCA analysis of the Chinese 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP in the paper, with which conservative evaluation model plus best estimation analysis tool is applied, and effects of uncertainty of important plant state parameters are quantified.\n In the DRHM analysis of postulated LBLOCA caused by double ended-guillotine-cold-leg break for the 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP in this paper, the evaluation model RELAP5-APK (the conservative Appendix K physical models plus best-estimate system analysis code RELAP5/MOD3) is developed and verified. And during the transient analysis of the LBLOCA scenario, uncertainty of the effects of important plant state parameters are quantified through statistical sampling and corresponding calculation. Taking the cladding peak temperature (PCT) index for demonstration to measure the safety margin, the single-sided confidence upper limit including 95% PCT of the sampling population with 95% confidence level is acquired. The resultant shows that a greater PCT margin is achieved compared with that in the original FSAR. This provide a further confidence for life extension or power uprate of the plant.","PeriodicalId":325659,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Thermal-Hydraulics and Safety Analysis","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7B: Thermal-Hydraulics and Safety Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/icone29-92431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loss of coolant accident (LOCA) is among the important limiting design basis accidents for a PWR nuclear power plant (NPP). In China, a 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP, although facing the challenge of life extension, still adopted rather conservative tools and methods for safety analysis. This is supposed to have guaranteed sufficient margin for safe operation of the plant during the past years, yet, at the expense of plant economy and operation flexibility. To evaluate the safety margin more reasonably and realistically, the mixed methodology of DRHM (deterministic realistic hybrid methodology) is introduced for LBLOCA analysis of the Chinese 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP in the paper, with which conservative evaluation model plus best estimation analysis tool is applied, and effects of uncertainty of important plant state parameters are quantified. In the DRHM analysis of postulated LBLOCA caused by double ended-guillotine-cold-leg break for the 300MWe two-loop PWR NPP in this paper, the evaluation model RELAP5-APK (the conservative Appendix K physical models plus best-estimate system analysis code RELAP5/MOD3) is developed and verified. And during the transient analysis of the LBLOCA scenario, uncertainty of the effects of important plant state parameters are quantified through statistical sampling and corresponding calculation. Taking the cladding peak temperature (PCT) index for demonstration to measure the safety margin, the single-sided confidence upper limit including 95% PCT of the sampling population with 95% confidence level is acquired. The resultant shows that a greater PCT margin is achieved compared with that in the original FSAR. This provide a further confidence for life extension or power uprate of the plant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于确定性现实混合方法的中国300MWe双环压水堆NPP LBLOCA分析
冷却剂损失事故是压水堆核电站重要的限制设计基础事故之一。在中国,300MWe双回路压水堆核电站虽然面临延寿的挑战,但其安全分析工具和方法仍较为保守。这是为了保证电厂在过去几年的安全运行有足够的余量,但却以牺牲电厂的经济性和运行灵活性为代价。为了更合理、更真实地评价安全裕度,本文将确定性现实混合法(DRHM)引入我国300MWe双环压水堆核电站LBLOCA分析中,采用保守评价模型加最佳估计分析工具,量化电厂重要状态参数不确定性的影响。本文在对300MWe双环压水堆核电站双端断头台冷腿断口造成的LBLOCA的DRHM分析中,建立并验证了评估模型RELAP5- apk(保守的附录K物理模型加最佳估计系统分析代码RELAP5/MOD3)。在LBLOCA情景的暂态分析中,通过统计抽样和相应的计算,量化了电厂重要状态参数影响的不确定性。以包层峰值温度(PCT)指数为论证,衡量安全裕度,得到了包含95% PCT的抽样总体单侧置信度上限,置信度为95%。结果表明,与原始FSAR相比,实现了更大的PCT余量。这为延长机组寿命或提高机组功率提供了进一步的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental and Numerical Study on Convective Heat Transfer Characteristic in the Turbulent Region of Molten Salt in Shell-Side of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Thermal-Hydraulic Safety Analysis of Natural Circulation Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor SNCLFR-100 Core Based on Porous Medium Approach Verification Dynamic Response for Sinusoidal Wave Flow in Narrow Rectangular Channel Machine Learning Modelling of Decay Heat Removal in High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of the Natural Circulation Characteristics Based on PLANDTL-DHX for Different Modeling Methods of the Core
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1