Robustness of DAS Beamformer Over MVDR for Replay Attack Detection On Voice Assistants

Piyushkumar K. Chodingala, Shreya S. Chaturvedi, Ankur T. Patil, H. Patil
{"title":"Robustness of DAS Beamformer Over MVDR for Replay Attack Detection On Voice Assistants","authors":"Piyushkumar K. Chodingala, Shreya S. Chaturvedi, Ankur T. Patil, H. Patil","doi":"10.1109/SPCOM55316.2022.9840757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increased use of Virtual Assistants (VAs) for various personal usage, the safety of VAs from various spoofing attacks is utmost important. To that effect, we investigate the significance of Delay-and-Sum (DAS) beamformer over state-of-the-art Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) along with Teager Energy Operator (TEO)-based features for replay Spoof Speech Detection (SSD) on VAs. Conventional DAS method is known to suppress the additive noise component and retains the reverberation effect (i.e., an important acoustic cue for replay SSD). On the contrary, MVDR used for Distant Speech Recognition (DSR) suppresses the reverberation effect and additive noise. Hence, MVDR is not suitable choice for replay SSD, whereas DAS can be exploited for replay SSD in VAs. Furthermore, suppression of reverberation due to the DAS vs. MVDR beamformer is analyzed via TEO profile. The experimental validation is done on recently released Realistic Replay Attack Microphone-Array Speech Corpus (ReMASC) and its DAS vs. MVDR beamformed versions. Furthermore, Teager Energy Cepstral Coefficients (TECC) feature set is employed as it is recently shown to capture the characteristics of reverberation for replay SSD task. For performance comparison, Constant-Q Cepstral Coefficients (CQCC), Linear Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (LFCC), and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) feature sets along with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) classifier are used. In particular, TECC-GMM SSD system on DAS gave relative reduction in %EER by 13.12% and 43.16% for Eval set as compared to the original ReMASC and its MVDR beamformed version, respectively. Finally, relative significance of TECC w.r.t. practical deployment is shown through latency analysis of various SSD systems for VAs.","PeriodicalId":246982,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPCOM55316.2022.9840757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Due to the increased use of Virtual Assistants (VAs) for various personal usage, the safety of VAs from various spoofing attacks is utmost important. To that effect, we investigate the significance of Delay-and-Sum (DAS) beamformer over state-of-the-art Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) along with Teager Energy Operator (TEO)-based features for replay Spoof Speech Detection (SSD) on VAs. Conventional DAS method is known to suppress the additive noise component and retains the reverberation effect (i.e., an important acoustic cue for replay SSD). On the contrary, MVDR used for Distant Speech Recognition (DSR) suppresses the reverberation effect and additive noise. Hence, MVDR is not suitable choice for replay SSD, whereas DAS can be exploited for replay SSD in VAs. Furthermore, suppression of reverberation due to the DAS vs. MVDR beamformer is analyzed via TEO profile. The experimental validation is done on recently released Realistic Replay Attack Microphone-Array Speech Corpus (ReMASC) and its DAS vs. MVDR beamformed versions. Furthermore, Teager Energy Cepstral Coefficients (TECC) feature set is employed as it is recently shown to capture the characteristics of reverberation for replay SSD task. For performance comparison, Constant-Q Cepstral Coefficients (CQCC), Linear Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (LFCC), and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) feature sets along with Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) classifier are used. In particular, TECC-GMM SSD system on DAS gave relative reduction in %EER by 13.12% and 43.16% for Eval set as compared to the original ReMASC and its MVDR beamformed version, respectively. Finally, relative significance of TECC w.r.t. practical deployment is shown through latency analysis of various SSD systems for VAs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于MVDR的DAS波束形成器对语音助手重放攻击检测的鲁棒性
由于各种个人用途越来越多地使用虚拟助理(VAs),因此虚拟助理免受各种欺骗攻击的安全性至关重要。为此,我们研究了延迟和和(DAS)波束形成器相对于最先进的最小方差无失真响应(MVDR)的重要性,以及基于Teager能量算子(TEO)的特征,用于VAs上的重放欺骗语音检测(SSD)。已知传统的DAS方法可以抑制加性噪声成分并保留混响效应(即,重放SSD的重要声学线索)。相反,用于远距离语音识别(DSR)的MVDR可以抑制混响效应和加性噪声。因此,MVDR不适合用于重放SSD,而DAS可以用于VAs中的重放SSD。此外,通过TEO分析了DAS与MVDR波束形成器对混响的抑制。在最近发布的现实重播攻击麦克风阵列语音语料库(ReMASC)及其DAS与MVDR波束形成版本上进行了实验验证。此外,Teager能量倒谱系数(TECC)特征集被采用,因为它最近被证明可以捕捉重放SSD任务的混响特征。为了进行性能比较,使用了恒定q倒谱系数(CQCC),线性频率倒谱系数(LFCC)和Mel频率倒谱系数(MFCC)特征集以及高斯混合模型(GMM)分类器。特别是,DAS上的TECC-GMM SSD系统与原始ReMASC及其MVDR波束形成版本相比,Eval集的%EER分别相对降低了13.12%和43.16%。最后,通过对各种SSD系统的延迟分析,说明了TECC w.r.t.实际部署的相对意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
C-Band Iris Coupled Cavity Bandpass Filter A Wideband Bandpass Filter using U-shaped slots on SIW with two Notches at 8 GHz and 10 GHz Semi-Blind Technique for Frequency Selective Channel Estimation in Millimeter-Wave MIMO Coded FBMC System Binary Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces Assisted OFDM Systems Improving the Performance of Zero-Resource Children’s ASR System through Formant and Duration Modification based Data Augmentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1