For more United Nations rule-of-law “win-win” technical assistance outcomes amid migration

S. Redo
{"title":"For more United Nations rule-of-law “win-win” technical assistance outcomes amid migration","authors":"S. Redo","doi":"10.12775/sit.2021.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThis article focuses on the universal and time-honored Golden Rule, collo- quially known as “win-win”– a technical cooperation strategy, pursued in crime prevention and other fields.  In particular, the article ventures into John Rawls’s difference principle for the United Nations-inspired Rule- of-Law cooperation for crime prevention to meet sustainable development goal 10 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda (“Reduce inequality within and among countries”). His liberally egalitarian principle regards inequality as reasonable (justice as fairness) as long as it would make the least advantaged in society materially better off than they would be under strict equality. In line with the United Nations Charter establishing the duty to cooperate, the author looks into the principle’s Global North-South applicability, relevant especially for the Rule-of-Law impact on the benefactors and beneficiaries of the two major economic development initiatives: the 2019–2021 Blue Dot Network/Built Back Better World (BDN/B3W) and the 2013 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), both prone to migration flows. In their context he offers intercultural rationale and suggestions for a North-South crime prevention technical cooperation glocal86 approach that should be programmatically driven by universally relevant anti-corruption. Finally, the author alerts to the need of bringing into the North-South technical cooperation relationship people’s regard of Mother Earth (“triple wins”) and strategize that cooperation accordingly for a truly better world. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":445759,"journal":{"name":"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Iuridica Toruniensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/sit.2021.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the universal and time-honored Golden Rule, collo- quially known as “win-win”– a technical cooperation strategy, pursued in crime prevention and other fields.  In particular, the article ventures into John Rawls’s difference principle for the United Nations-inspired Rule- of-Law cooperation for crime prevention to meet sustainable development goal 10 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda (“Reduce inequality within and among countries”). His liberally egalitarian principle regards inequality as reasonable (justice as fairness) as long as it would make the least advantaged in society materially better off than they would be under strict equality. In line with the United Nations Charter establishing the duty to cooperate, the author looks into the principle’s Global North-South applicability, relevant especially for the Rule-of-Law impact on the benefactors and beneficiaries of the two major economic development initiatives: the 2019–2021 Blue Dot Network/Built Back Better World (BDN/B3W) and the 2013 Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), both prone to migration flows. In their context he offers intercultural rationale and suggestions for a North-South crime prevention technical cooperation glocal86 approach that should be programmatically driven by universally relevant anti-corruption. Finally, the author alerts to the need of bringing into the North-South technical cooperation relationship people’s regard of Mother Earth (“triple wins”) and strategize that cooperation accordingly for a truly better world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
争取在移民问题上取得更多联合国法治“双赢”技术援助成果
本文的重点是普遍和历史悠久的黄金法则,俗称“双赢”,是一种在预防犯罪和其他领域奉行的技术合作战略。本文特别探讨了约翰·罗尔斯提出的差异原则,即联合国倡导的预防犯罪的法治合作,以实现2030年联合国议程的可持续发展目标10(“减少国家内部和国家之间的不平等”)。他的自由平等主义原则认为不平等是合理的(正义即公平),只要它能使社会中最弱势的人在物质上比他们在严格平等的情况下过得更好。根据《联合国宪章》确立的合作义务,作者研究了这一原则在全球南北的适用性,特别是与法治对两大经济发展倡议的捐助者和受益者的影响有关:2019-2021年蓝点网络/重建更美好的世界(BDN/B3W)和2013年“一带一路”倡议(BRI),两者都容易发生移民流动。在此背景下,他为南北预防犯罪技术合作(glocal86)方法提供了跨文化的理论依据和建议,该方法应由普遍相关的反腐败在方案上推动。最后,作者提醒需要在南北技术合作关系中纳入人们对地球母亲的关注(“三赢”),并相应地制定合作战略,以实现真正更美好的世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relacja pomiędzy prawem własności intelektualnej i sztuką tatuażu Rozwój „umów najmu skrytki depozytowej” poza sektorem bankowym w polskiej praktyce gospodarczej Collective patients’ rights in Polish law. Selected problems Mikołaj Kopernik w służbie prawa i polityki Ewolucja prawnej regulacji administracyjnego postępowania egzekucyjnego w Polsce
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1