Foreign Technology, Spillovers and R&D Policy

M. Muniagurria, Nirvikar Singh
{"title":"Foreign Technology, Spillovers and R&D Policy","authors":"M. Muniagurria, Nirvikar Singh","doi":"10.2307/2527381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the nature of appropriate domestic R\\&D policy in an imperfectly competitive world, where both the R\\&D rivalry among firms and the presence of technological spillovers from a superior foreign technology play a crucial role.There are two firms (a foreign and a domestic firm) that are located in the domestic country, produce a commodity that is sold overseas and compete both in an output and an R\\&D stage. We use the basic Spencer and Brander (1983) model with three modifications. First, we introduce R\\&D dynamics by considering both an initial R\\&D investment and a subsequent improvement. Firms invest in R\\&D in period one and can make further improvements in period two. Second, we introduce an asymmetry between the two firms: the foreign firm is more advanced -so it has to invest fewer resources to achieve a given technological level. Third, we consider technological spillovers between firms. We find that the appropriate R&D policy balances the strategic incentive to induce a reduction in foreign initial R&D with the spillover incentive to induce the foreign firm to invest more. If initial foreign R &D increases the present value of domestic profits (i.e., the spillover effect dominates), either a tax to first period domestic R&D or a subsidy to domestic imitation is appropriate. If instead improvements in first period foreign technology have a negative effect on the present value of domestic profits (i.e., the strategic effect dominates) a subsidy to first period domestic R\\&D is appropriate.In this case, the nature of the optimal policy on imitation will depend on the relative importance of first and second period effects.","PeriodicalId":341672,"journal":{"name":"Development and Comp Systems","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Comp Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2527381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

We study the nature of appropriate domestic R\&D policy in an imperfectly competitive world, where both the R\&D rivalry among firms and the presence of technological spillovers from a superior foreign technology play a crucial role.There are two firms (a foreign and a domestic firm) that are located in the domestic country, produce a commodity that is sold overseas and compete both in an output and an R\&D stage. We use the basic Spencer and Brander (1983) model with three modifications. First, we introduce R\&D dynamics by considering both an initial R\&D investment and a subsequent improvement. Firms invest in R\&D in period one and can make further improvements in period two. Second, we introduce an asymmetry between the two firms: the foreign firm is more advanced -so it has to invest fewer resources to achieve a given technological level. Third, we consider technological spillovers between firms. We find that the appropriate R&D policy balances the strategic incentive to induce a reduction in foreign initial R&D with the spillover incentive to induce the foreign firm to invest more. If initial foreign R &D increases the present value of domestic profits (i.e., the spillover effect dominates), either a tax to first period domestic R&D or a subsidy to domestic imitation is appropriate. If instead improvements in first period foreign technology have a negative effect on the present value of domestic profits (i.e., the strategic effect dominates) a subsidy to first period domestic R\&D is appropriate.In this case, the nature of the optimal policy on imitation will depend on the relative importance of first and second period effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外国技术、溢出效应与研发政策
本文研究了在不完全竞争环境下,企业之间的研发竞争和来自国外优势技术的技术溢出都起着至关重要的作用,适当的国内研发政策的性质。有两家公司(一家外国公司和一家国内公司),它们位于国内,生产一种销往海外的商品,并在产出和研发阶段竞争。我们使用斯宾塞和布兰德(1983)的基本模型,并对其进行了三处修改。首先,我们通过考虑最初的研发投资和随后的改进来引入研发动态。企业在第一阶段投资于研发,在第二阶段可以进一步改进。其次,我们引入了两家公司之间的不对称:外国公司更先进——因此它必须投入更少的资源来达到给定的技术水平。第三,我们考虑了企业间的技术溢出效应。研究发现,适当的研发政策能够平衡诱导外国企业减少初始研发的战略激励与诱导外国企业增加投资的溢出激励。如果最初的国外研发增加了国内利润的现值(即溢出效应占主导地位),对第一期国内研发征税或补贴国内模仿是合适的。相反,如果第一阶段外国技术的改进对国内利润的现值有负面影响(即战略效应占主导地位),那么对第一阶段国内研发的补贴是适当的。在这种情况下,最优模仿政策的性质将取决于第一阶段和第二阶段效应的相对重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canaries and Vultures: A Quantitative History of Monetary Mismanagement in Brazil Trade Liberalisation and Poverty in Nepal: A Computable General Equilibrium Micro Simulation Analysis A Test of the Controversial Assumptions in the McKinnon-Shaw Hypothesis versus Neo-Structuralist Propositions : An Empirical Test From a Field Survey in the Congo Slave Redemption When it Takes Time to Redeem Slaves Construction of CPIX Data for Forecasting and Modelling in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1