A comparative analysis of fuzzy-based AHP derived MCDM methods to select the apt heterogeneous wireless network

V. Sasirekha, M. Ilangkumaran, G. Sakthivel
{"title":"A comparative analysis of fuzzy-based AHP derived MCDM methods to select the apt heterogeneous wireless network","authors":"V. Sasirekha, M. Ilangkumaran, G. Sakthivel","doi":"10.1504/IJIDS.2016.10000237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of the most appropriate network in heterogeneous wireless environment is one of the critical issues to provide the best quality of service (QOS) to the users. The selection of an apt network among various alternatives is a kind of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. The aim of this paper is to describe the applications of three MCDM methods for solving the network selection problem. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)- VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in Serbian (VIKOR), FAHP-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and FAHP-preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) are proposed to choose the best network among the various network alternatives. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other. This study comprises five alternatives such as wireless local area network (WLAN), general packet radio service (GPRS), universal mobile telecommunication (UMTS), code-division multiple-access (CDMA), worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WIMAX) and ten evaluation criteria namely bandwidth, latency, jitter, throughput, bit error rate, packet loss, re-transmission, cost, security and preference to select the appropriate network.","PeriodicalId":303039,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2016.10000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The selection of the most appropriate network in heterogeneous wireless environment is one of the critical issues to provide the best quality of service (QOS) to the users. The selection of an apt network among various alternatives is a kind of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. The aim of this paper is to describe the applications of three MCDM methods for solving the network selection problem. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP)- VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in Serbian (VIKOR), FAHP-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and FAHP-preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) are proposed to choose the best network among the various network alternatives. The ranking performance of various MCDM methods is also compared with each other. This study comprises five alternatives such as wireless local area network (WLAN), general packet radio service (GPRS), universal mobile telecommunication (UMTS), code-division multiple-access (CDMA), worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WIMAX) and ten evaluation criteria namely bandwidth, latency, jitter, throughput, bit error rate, packet loss, re-transmission, cost, security and preference to select the appropriate network.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较分析了基于模糊层次分析法的MCDM方法对异构无线网络的选择
在异构无线环境中选择最合适的网络是向用户提供最佳服务质量的关键问题之一。在众多备选方案中选择合适的网络是一种多准则决策问题。本文的目的是描述三种MCDM方法在解决网络选择问题中的应用。提出了模糊层次分析法(FAHP)- VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje in塞尔维亚语(VIKOR)、基于理想解相似性排序偏好的FAHP技术(TOPSIS)和用于富集评价的FAHP偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE)来从各种网络方案中选择最佳网络。对各种MCDM方法的排序性能进行了比较。本研究包括无线局域网(WLAN)、通用分组无线业务(GPRS)、通用移动通信(UMTS)、码分多址(CDMA)、微波接入全球互操作性(WIMAX)等5个备选方案,以及带宽、延迟、抖动、吞吐量、误码率、丢包、重传、成本、安全性和选择合适网络的偏好等10个评估标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the relationship between sustainability and software performance Health information exchange adoption: influences of public insurance programs Evaluation of risk causing factors for the incidence of neck and shoulder pain in adolescents using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process Technical debt reduction using epsilon-Nash equilibrium for the perturbed software refactor game model Performance evaluation of arc welding processes for the manufacturing of pressure vessel using novel hybrid MCDM technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1