Risk Management for the Future: Age, Risk, and Choice Architecture

Orly Lobel, On Amir
{"title":"Risk Management for the Future: Age, Risk, and Choice Architecture","authors":"Orly Lobel, On Amir","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2716058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can regulation in an era of personal responsibility aid people to make the optimal decisions about their future risks, savings, and retirement? This study aims to deepen our understanding of how different age groups process choices in relation to future risk and retirement planning in diverse decision-making environments. In a series of experiments, we examine how age and the life cycle interact with the decision-making environment concerning savings, retirement and well-being. Across multiple experiments we find that when cognitive resources are available older participants opt for more prudent and future oriented financial and retirement choices, but that this pattern does not hold in situations that do not allow the luxury of executive control override. Moreover, in some instances, we find an increased effect of resource depletion for older compared to younger participants. At a theoretical level our findings suggest that much of the difference in financial choices between older and younger decision makers rests in the ability of each age group to override their intuitive and automatic responses to such decisions. At the policy level, as the regulatory field is moving from command-and-control rules to the provision of menu options and choice architecture, our findings provide potential guidelines for better designing retirement and savings plans, such as the implementation of SMT-style programs and the encouragement of annuity over lump sum retirement benefits.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netspar Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2716058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How can regulation in an era of personal responsibility aid people to make the optimal decisions about their future risks, savings, and retirement? This study aims to deepen our understanding of how different age groups process choices in relation to future risk and retirement planning in diverse decision-making environments. In a series of experiments, we examine how age and the life cycle interact with the decision-making environment concerning savings, retirement and well-being. Across multiple experiments we find that when cognitive resources are available older participants opt for more prudent and future oriented financial and retirement choices, but that this pattern does not hold in situations that do not allow the luxury of executive control override. Moreover, in some instances, we find an increased effect of resource depletion for older compared to younger participants. At a theoretical level our findings suggest that much of the difference in financial choices between older and younger decision makers rests in the ability of each age group to override their intuitive and automatic responses to such decisions. At the policy level, as the regulatory field is moving from command-and-control rules to the provision of menu options and choice architecture, our findings provide potential guidelines for better designing retirement and savings plans, such as the implementation of SMT-style programs and the encouragement of annuity over lump sum retirement benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未来的风险管理:年龄、风险和选择架构
在个人责任时代,监管如何帮助人们对未来的风险、储蓄和退休做出最佳决策?本研究旨在加深我们对不同年龄群体在不同决策环境下如何处理与未来风险和退休计划相关的选择的理解。在一系列的实验中,我们研究了年龄和生命周期如何与储蓄、退休和幸福的决策环境相互作用。在多个实验中,我们发现,当认知资源可用时,年长的参与者会选择更谨慎和面向未来的财务和退休选择,但这种模式在不允许奢侈的行政控制超越的情况下并不成立。此外,在某些情况下,我们发现与年轻参与者相比,资源枯竭对老年人的影响更大。在理论层面上,我们的研究结果表明,老年人和年轻人在财务选择上的差异很大程度上取决于每个年龄段的人对这些决定的直觉和自动反应的能力。在政策层面,随着监管领域从命令和控制规则转向提供菜单选项和选择架构,我们的研究结果为更好地设计退休和储蓄计划提供了潜在的指导方针,例如实施smt式计划和鼓励年金而不是一次性退休福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consumers’ Decaying Generosity Can Sustain a Profit-Oriented Firm Dependent on Social Preferences The Malthusian Origins of the General Theory: Or How Keynes Came to Write a Book About Say’s Law and Effective Demand Review of Divine Economics Framework Financialization and Hysteresis: The Case of Chile Several Considerations on Commercial Techniques, in the Student's Interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1