Do nurses have the switch factor?

G. Mulders, N. Uitslager, Sharon Alavian, A. Wareing, Kathi Stein Oldenburg
{"title":"Do nurses have the switch factor?","authors":"G. Mulders, N. Uitslager, Sharon Alavian, A. Wareing, Kathi Stein Oldenburg","doi":"10.17225/jhp00162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Switching between clotting factor products is becoming increasingly common as product choice increases and financial pressure grows to choose the most cost-effective options. Guidance on carrying out the switch recommends a complex and long process that may benefit from being defined in a protocol. Haemophilia nurses may be responsible for managing product switches; anecdotal evidence suggests that clinical practice is variable. Aim To explore the role of specialist nurses in switching between clotting factor products and their use of a protocol. Method Nurses attending the 2018 World Federation of Hemophilia Congress were surveyed about clinical practice at their treatment centre and use of a protocol for switching clotting factor products. Results Of 192 nurses attending the conference, 49 nurses returned completed questionnaires, 45 of which were included in the study after exclusions. Responses were exclusively from economically developed countries. Almost all respondents (96%) had direct experience of switching. Half of those who responded to a question about protocol-based switching reported that switches were based on a protocol. When authorship was reported, the protocol was written by haemophilia nurses in about half of cases. Practice about blood testing to determine individual pharmacokinetic parameters prior to the switch was variable, but most nurses (86%) reported screening for inhibitors prior to switching. Respondents agreed to share their protocols among their peers, although only four were received by the research team. Conclusions Clinical practice in switching between clotting factor products is variable. Some nurses are switching treatments for patients without the supported of a written protocol, whereas others are involved in writing and implementing protocols. Sharing protocols is a first step in helping to establish best practice.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Switching between clotting factor products is becoming increasingly common as product choice increases and financial pressure grows to choose the most cost-effective options. Guidance on carrying out the switch recommends a complex and long process that may benefit from being defined in a protocol. Haemophilia nurses may be responsible for managing product switches; anecdotal evidence suggests that clinical practice is variable. Aim To explore the role of specialist nurses in switching between clotting factor products and their use of a protocol. Method Nurses attending the 2018 World Federation of Hemophilia Congress were surveyed about clinical practice at their treatment centre and use of a protocol for switching clotting factor products. Results Of 192 nurses attending the conference, 49 nurses returned completed questionnaires, 45 of which were included in the study after exclusions. Responses were exclusively from economically developed countries. Almost all respondents (96%) had direct experience of switching. Half of those who responded to a question about protocol-based switching reported that switches were based on a protocol. When authorship was reported, the protocol was written by haemophilia nurses in about half of cases. Practice about blood testing to determine individual pharmacokinetic parameters prior to the switch was variable, but most nurses (86%) reported screening for inhibitors prior to switching. Respondents agreed to share their protocols among their peers, although only four were received by the research team. Conclusions Clinical practice in switching between clotting factor products is variable. Some nurses are switching treatments for patients without the supported of a written protocol, whereas others are involved in writing and implementing protocols. Sharing protocols is a first step in helping to establish best practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士有转换因素吗?
随着产品选择的增加和经济压力的增加,选择最具成本效益的产品,在凝血因子产品之间的切换变得越来越普遍。执行转换的指南建议一个复杂而漫长的过程,可能受益于在协议中定义。血友病护士可能负责管理产品切换;轶事证据表明临床实践是多变的。目的探讨专科护士在凝血因子产品转换及其使用方案中的作用。方法对参加2018年世界血友病联合会大会的护士进行调查,了解其治疗中心的临床实践和切换凝血因子产品的使用方案。结果192名护士参加会议,49名护士返回完成的问卷,其中45名护士经排除后纳入研究。答复完全来自经济发达国家。几乎所有的受访者(96%)都有过转换的直接经历。在回答关于基于协议的交换的问题时,有一半的人表示交换机是基于协议的。当作者报告时,大约一半的病例是由血友病护士撰写的。在换药前进行血液检测以确定个体药代动力学参数的做法各不相同,但大多数护士(86%)报告在换药前进行了抑制剂筛查。受访者同意在同行中分享他们的协议,尽管研究团队只收到了四份。结论凝血因子产品转换的临床实践是多变的。一些护士在没有书面协议支持的情况下为病人改变治疗方法,而另一些护士则参与编写和实施协议。共享协议是帮助建立最佳实践的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living, Caring, Learning – The treatment centre as family for a woman with severe haemophilia Living, Caring, Learning – Reflections on the therapeutic relationship in haemophilia care Future Care Pathways – A report from the 1st workshop of the EHC Think Tank Workstream on Future Care Pathways The impact of the Contaminated Blood Scandal on the next generation: the state of the evidence Editorial – Living, Caring, Learning: How patients shape the specialist haemophilia nurse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1