Plant-based protein products in the news: Mind the gap between innovation and public discourses

M. Tziva, A. Kalfagianni, S. Negro, M. Hekkert
{"title":"Plant-based protein products in the news: Mind the gap between innovation and public discourses","authors":"M. Tziva, A. Kalfagianni, S. Negro, M. Hekkert","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Markets for plant-based protein products are experiencing unprecedented growth. However, the extent to which the wider diffusion of plant-based protein products is beneficial to human and planetary health is still a contested issue in public discourses. The study of media frames for plant-based protein products can serve as a basis for approaches of technology assessment, which aim to inform actors involved in innovation processes of important aspects of diffusion, including controversy and unexpected risks regarding societal reactions. In this paper, we conduct a frame analysis of three U.K. broadsheet newspapers (the Telegraph, the Guardian, and the Times) between 2010–2020 to explore how media frame plant-based protein products. The results show that overall media coverage for plant-based diets has adopted a positive stance. However, there is variation in how plant-based protein products and particularly meat and dairy substitutes are portrayed. The biggest stumbling block appears to be potentially adverse health implications associated with the consumption of meat and dairy substitutes. We therefore argue that the scope of strategic choices regarding product design should also focus on the development of products more analogous to whole plant-based foods. Moreover, we argue that the long-term resilience of the plant-based protein sector will require strategies that convincingly align with policy goals for food security and broader food system sustainability.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Markets for plant-based protein products are experiencing unprecedented growth. However, the extent to which the wider diffusion of plant-based protein products is beneficial to human and planetary health is still a contested issue in public discourses. The study of media frames for plant-based protein products can serve as a basis for approaches of technology assessment, which aim to inform actors involved in innovation processes of important aspects of diffusion, including controversy and unexpected risks regarding societal reactions. In this paper, we conduct a frame analysis of three U.K. broadsheet newspapers (the Telegraph, the Guardian, and the Times) between 2010–2020 to explore how media frame plant-based protein products. The results show that overall media coverage for plant-based diets has adopted a positive stance. However, there is variation in how plant-based protein products and particularly meat and dairy substitutes are portrayed. The biggest stumbling block appears to be potentially adverse health implications associated with the consumption of meat and dairy substitutes. We therefore argue that the scope of strategic choices regarding product design should also focus on the development of products more analogous to whole plant-based foods. Moreover, we argue that the long-term resilience of the plant-based protein sector will require strategies that convincingly align with policy goals for food security and broader food system sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新闻中的植物蛋白产品:注意创新和公共话语之间的差距
植物蛋白产品的市场正在经历前所未有的增长。然而,植物蛋白产品的广泛传播在多大程度上有利于人类和地球健康,在公共话语中仍然是一个有争议的问题。植物蛋白产品媒介框架的研究可以作为技术评估方法的基础,其目的是向参与创新过程的行动者通报传播的重要方面,包括争议和有关社会反应的意外风险。在本文中,我们对2010-2020年间三家英国大报(《电讯报》、《卫报》和《泰晤士报》)进行了框架分析,以探索媒体如何构建植物性蛋白质产品。结果表明,媒体对植物性饮食的总体报道采取了积极的立场。然而,植物蛋白产品,特别是肉类和乳制品替代品的描述存在差异。最大的障碍似乎是与食用肉类和乳制品替代品相关的潜在不利健康影响。因此,我们认为,有关产品设计的战略选择范围也应侧重于开发更类似于全植物性食品的产品。此外,我们认为,植物性蛋白质部门的长期弹性将需要与粮食安全和更广泛的粮食系统可持续性的政策目标令人信服地保持一致的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International alliances and technology diffusion: A worldwide analysis of adoption of energy, railway and satellite technologies An assessment of policies to promote perennial energy crop and woodland planting Media narratives on (Ecological) sustainability: A topic modeling analysis of entrepreneurship news in the MENA region Circular bioeconomy practices and their associations with household food security in four RUNRES African city regions Haven or hell? A perspective on the ecology of offshore oil and gas platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1