Dots and Incipients: Extended Features for Partial Fingerprint Matching

Yi Chen, A.K. Jain
{"title":"Dots and Incipients: Extended Features for Partial Fingerprint Matching","authors":"Yi Chen, A.K. Jain","doi":"10.1109/BCC.2007.4430538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are fundamental differences in the way fingerprints are compared by forensic examiners and current automatic systems. For example, while automatic systems focus mainly on the quantitative measures of fingerprint minutiae (ridge ending and bifurcation points), forensic examiners often analyze details of intrinsic ridge characteristics and relational information. This process, known as qualitative friction ridge analysis [1], includes examination of ridge shape, pores, dots, incipient ridges, etc. This explains the challenges that current automatic systems face in processing partial fingerprints, mostly seen in latents. The forensics and automatic fingerprint identification systems (AFIS) communities have been active in standardizing the definition of extended feature set, as well as quantifying the relevance and reliability of these features for automatic matching systems. CDEFFS (committee to define an extended feature set) has proposed a working draft on possible definitions and representations of extended features [2]. However, benefits of utilizing these extended features in automatic systems are not yet known. While fingerprint matching technology is quite mature for matching tenprints [3], matching partial fingerprints, especially latents, still needs a lot of improvement. We propose an algorithm to extract two major level 3 feature types, dots and incipients, based on local phase symmetry and demonstrate their effectiveness in partial print matching. Since dots and incipients can be easily encoded by forensic examiners, we believe the results of this research will have benefits to next generation identification (NGI) systems.","PeriodicalId":389417,"journal":{"name":"2007 Biometrics Symposium","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Biometrics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BCC.2007.4430538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

There are fundamental differences in the way fingerprints are compared by forensic examiners and current automatic systems. For example, while automatic systems focus mainly on the quantitative measures of fingerprint minutiae (ridge ending and bifurcation points), forensic examiners often analyze details of intrinsic ridge characteristics and relational information. This process, known as qualitative friction ridge analysis [1], includes examination of ridge shape, pores, dots, incipient ridges, etc. This explains the challenges that current automatic systems face in processing partial fingerprints, mostly seen in latents. The forensics and automatic fingerprint identification systems (AFIS) communities have been active in standardizing the definition of extended feature set, as well as quantifying the relevance and reliability of these features for automatic matching systems. CDEFFS (committee to define an extended feature set) has proposed a working draft on possible definitions and representations of extended features [2]. However, benefits of utilizing these extended features in automatic systems are not yet known. While fingerprint matching technology is quite mature for matching tenprints [3], matching partial fingerprints, especially latents, still needs a lot of improvement. We propose an algorithm to extract two major level 3 feature types, dots and incipients, based on local phase symmetry and demonstrate their effectiveness in partial print matching. Since dots and incipients can be easily encoded by forensic examiners, we believe the results of this research will have benefits to next generation identification (NGI) systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点和起始点:部分指纹匹配的扩展特征
法医鉴定人员比较指纹的方式与目前的自动系统有根本的不同。例如,自动系统主要关注指纹细节的定量测量(脊末和分岔点),而法医检验人员通常分析固有脊特征和相关信息的细节。这一过程被称为定性摩擦脊分析[1],包括对脊形状、孔隙、点、初始脊等的检查。这就解释了当前自动系统在处理部分指纹时所面临的挑战,这些指纹大多出现在潜在的指纹中。取证和自动指纹识别系统(AFIS)社区一直在积极标准化扩展特征集的定义,以及量化自动匹配系统中这些特征的相关性和可靠性。CDEFFS(定义扩展特征集委员会)已经就扩展特征[2]的可能定义和表示提出了一个工作草案。然而,在自动系统中利用这些扩展特性的好处尚不清楚。虽然指纹匹配技术对于10个指纹的匹配已经相当成熟,但是部分指纹尤其是潜在指纹的匹配仍然需要大量的改进。我们提出了一种基于局部相位对称提取两种主要的3级特征类型(点和初始点)的算法,并证明了它们在部分打印匹配中的有效性。由于点和起始点可以很容易地被法医鉴定人员编码,我们相信这项研究的结果将有利于下一代识别(NGI)系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Illumination Normalization Based on Simplified Local Binary Patterns for A Face Verification System Non-Metric Biometric Clustering Face Pose Correction With Eyeglasses and Occlusions Removal Towards Unattended and Privacy Protected Border Control Reducing Speaker Model Search Space in Speaker Identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1