{"title":"LANDSCAPE COMPATIBILITY OF FACTORIES: FROM PRACTICES TO TACTICS","authors":"Lia Marchi, E. Antonini, S. Evans","doi":"10.2495/arc180031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2019 WIT Press. Industrial facilities are responsible for several detrimental effects on the landscape. Impact occurs in terms of both interference in the main ecosystem’s physical matrices and intense perceptual-aesthetic contrasts with the landscape. As a result, the social sphere also is affected and corporate identity is threatened. Agri-food companies are particularly touched by the issue due to the high environmental impact of their processes, their recurring proximity to the rural landscape, and the strong link between corporate image and environmental attitude. Since the Eighties, literature and regulations have proved harmonisation between industry and landscape is a crucial element of companies’ social awareness. In this framework, some tools have been developed to analyse the impacts, but their main focus is on environmental issues. Nowadays there is no unitary vision capable of balancing manufacturing requirements with effective measures to mitigate the impact of factories on the landscape at all different levels. Our research therefore aims to define a methodology to analyse how agri-food facilities interfere with the landscape and to develop a set of measures suitable to promote less conflictual relationships. This can be achieved by combining the natural, perceptual-aesthetic and social/cultural dimensions of landscape. The goal is to develop a design support tool to analyse impacts and prioritise weaknesses, thereby helping companies to define case-specific mitigation strategies. In particular, the paper presents real life case studies noteworthy for the adoption of mitigation practices, from which a set of general tactics was devised. Over 50 exemplary facilities have been analysed, 200 good practices identified, and more than 100 general mitigation tactics formulated. Furthermore, the study has identified recurrent patterns in the architecture of factories, which generally confirm trends found in literature.","PeriodicalId":431486,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Architecture VII: Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/arc180031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
工厂景观兼容性:从实践到策略
©2019 WIT出版社。工业设施对景观造成了若干不利影响。影响发生在对主要生态系统的物理矩阵的干扰和与景观强烈的感知美学对比方面。因此,社会领域也受到影响,企业形象受到威胁。农业食品公司尤其受到这个问题的影响,因为他们的生产过程对环境的影响很大,他们经常接近农村景观,以及企业形象与环境态度之间的紧密联系。自上世纪80年代以来,文献和法规已经证明,工业和景观之间的协调是企业社会意识的关键因素。在这个框架中,已经开发了一些工具来分析影响,但它们的主要重点是环境问题。如今,没有一个统一的愿景能够平衡生产需求和有效的措施,以减轻工厂对景观的影响,在所有不同的层面。因此,我们的研究旨在定义一种方法来分析农业食品设施如何干扰景观,并制定一套适合的措施来促进较少冲突的关系。这可以通过结合自然、感知美学和景观的社会/文化维度来实现。目标是开发一种设计支持工具,以分析影响并确定弱点的优先次序,从而帮助公司确定针对具体情况的缓解战略。特别是,本文介绍了采用缓解实践值得注意的实际案例研究,并据此设计了一套一般策略。对50多个示范设施进行了分析,确定了200种良好做法,并制定了100多种一般性缓解策略。此外,该研究还确定了工厂建筑的循环模式,这通常证实了文献中发现的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。