Radiated immunity measurement comparison between OSL and chamber

Tae-Heon Jang, Won-seo Cho
{"title":"Radiated immunity measurement comparison between OSL and chamber","authors":"Tae-Heon Jang, Won-seo Cho","doi":"10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In CISPR 20, radiated immunity test is performed in the open stripline (OSL) which height is 0.8 m. CISPR 20 also specifies that equipment not fitting inside open stripline shall be measured according to IEC 61000-4-3 in frequency range of 80 MHz to 150 MHz with the same limits as in the OSL. In this paper, the analysis of the field distribution in the OSL was completed by moment method and the testing according to both methods was carried out and the immunity level has compared. The result shows that the testing in chamber is more severe than in OSL","PeriodicalId":130489,"journal":{"name":"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In CISPR 20, radiated immunity test is performed in the open stripline (OSL) which height is 0.8 m. CISPR 20 also specifies that equipment not fitting inside open stripline shall be measured according to IEC 61000-4-3 in frequency range of 80 MHz to 150 MHz with the same limits as in the OSL. In this paper, the analysis of the field distribution in the OSL was completed by moment method and the testing according to both methods was carried out and the immunity level has compared. The result shows that the testing in chamber is more severe than in OSL
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OSL与腔室辐射抗扰度测量比较
在CISPR 20中,辐射抗扰度试验在高度为0.8 m的开放带状线(OSL)中进行。CISPR 20还规定,未安装在开放式带状线内的设备应根据IEC 61000-4-3在80 MHz至150 MHz的频率范围内进行测量,其限制与OSL中的限制相同。本文采用矩量法分析了光路的场分布,并对两种方法进行了测试,比较了两种方法的抗扰度。结果表明,室内试验比室外试验更为严格
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A symmetric domain decomposition formulation of hybrid FEM-BEM coupling for electromagnetic analysis Comparison of on-line lightning monitoring system data with derived EM responses of space launch systems to lightning Improvement on the properties of SiC absorbers Inductive and capacitive couplings in DC motors with built-in damping chokes Shielding performance of a metallic rack used for telecommunication equipments: FIT modeling and measurements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1