[Functional prosthetic treatment for the partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants].

Les Cahiers de prothese Pub Date : 1990-12-01
J M Stein
{"title":"[Functional prosthetic treatment for the partially edentulous with osseointegrated implants].","authors":"J M Stein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The edentulous distal extension area has generally been restored with a removable partial denture. Some clinicians report long term success with a fixed partial denture containing distal cantilever pontic(s). Conversely, other clinicians find that the aforementioned is suspect at best due to the unusual stress demands placed on the abutment teeth by the pontic(s). When a tooth borne fixed partial denture is used to restore a long edentulous span, reports vary relative to long term success. The advent of osseointegrated implants as tooth substitutes may reduce and often eliminate particular compromised fixed or removable partial denture designs. Disregarding other problems that may or may not coexist with any remaining natural teeth in the same arch is a fallacious overview. It is paramount that future problems must be incorporated in any and all treatment plans at the same time the initial plan is formulated. Recent surveys reveal that a fewer percent of the population are becoming completely edentulous. Therefore, it is apparent that an increase in the treatment of the partially edentulous implant patient is a realistic consideration for all restorative dentists. However, it is ironic that those patients with the most severely debilitated conditions may often not be candidates for implant procedures. It is mandatory that a detailed explanation of any compromises and drawbacks to the final result must accompany the initial diagnostic presentation to the patient. It is quite evident that the dentist is confronted with a paradox that is difficult to resolve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 72","pages":"102-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The edentulous distal extension area has generally been restored with a removable partial denture. Some clinicians report long term success with a fixed partial denture containing distal cantilever pontic(s). Conversely, other clinicians find that the aforementioned is suspect at best due to the unusual stress demands placed on the abutment teeth by the pontic(s). When a tooth borne fixed partial denture is used to restore a long edentulous span, reports vary relative to long term success. The advent of osseointegrated implants as tooth substitutes may reduce and often eliminate particular compromised fixed or removable partial denture designs. Disregarding other problems that may or may not coexist with any remaining natural teeth in the same arch is a fallacious overview. It is paramount that future problems must be incorporated in any and all treatment plans at the same time the initial plan is formulated. Recent surveys reveal that a fewer percent of the population are becoming completely edentulous. Therefore, it is apparent that an increase in the treatment of the partially edentulous implant patient is a realistic consideration for all restorative dentists. However, it is ironic that those patients with the most severely debilitated conditions may often not be candidates for implant procedures. It is mandatory that a detailed explanation of any compromises and drawbacks to the final result must accompany the initial diagnostic presentation to the patient. It is quite evident that the dentist is confronted with a paradox that is difficult to resolve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨整合种植体治疗部分无牙的功能性修复。
无牙的远端延伸区一般用可摘局部义齿修复。一些临床医生报告长期成功的固定部分义齿包含远端悬臂桥。相反,其他临床医生发现,由于桥体对基牙施加了不寻常的压力要求,上述情况充其量是可疑的。当牙齿固定部分义齿用于修复长无牙义齿时,长期成功的报告各不相同。骨整合种植体作为牙齿替代品的出现可以减少并经常消除特定的受损固定或可移动局部义齿设计。忽视其他可能与同一牙弓中剩余的天然牙齿共存或不共存的问题是一种错误的概述。最重要的是,在制定初步计划的同时,必须将未来的问题纳入任何和所有的治疗计划。最近的调查显示,越来越少的人完全没有牙齿。因此,很明显,增加部分无牙种植患者的治疗是所有修复牙医现实的考虑。然而,具有讽刺意味的是,那些病情最严重的患者往往不适合植入手术。对最终结果的任何妥协和缺点的详细解释必须伴随着对患者的初步诊断报告。很明显,牙医面临着一个难以解决的矛盾。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dental Implants and Bone Grafts [Grooved bonded bridges. Protocols for fabrication and bonding]. [Esthetic aspects of crown lengthening]. [Ceramic fracture on large bridges. A restorative solution]. [Removable dentures for children].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1