[Evolving in prosthetics with the Brånemark system].

Les Cahiers de prothese Pub Date : 1990-12-01
P V Goldberg
{"title":"[Evolving in prosthetics with the Brånemark system].","authors":"P V Goldberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incorporation of the Brånemark root-form osseointegrated implant into the practice of Prosthodontics has opened up a new range of treatment options previously unavailable to our patients. No longer limited to their original use in restoring the completely edentulous arch, the role of implants now includes the replacement of one or more missing teeth in partially edentulous situations. Implants may also be incorporated into periodontal prostheses as supplemental support where the number or strength of existing natural abutments is inadequate, and used as a means of salvaging prostheses which have failed as a result of the loss of strategically important abutments. These newer applications, however, combined with patient demands for the optimum in esthetics as well as function, have served to challenge our ingenuity and resourcefulness in this rapidly evolving field. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the evolution of our implant experiences in recent years, and to illustrate the ways in which the Brånemark system has been utilized and adapted as the number and complexity of clinical situations have increased. Simply stated, the technical aspects of prosthetic treatment, those involving impression techniques, materials, etc., have remained fairly constant throughout our implant experience. The more dramatic changes have occurred through the utilization of newer components as they have become available, as well as through a growth in our application of the system and in our approach to treatment planning. The Brånemark system has been in use for just over 25 years at this point in time and has proven itself to be reliable, predictable and at the same time versatile enough to admirably meet the challenges placed on us by the new and varied clinical situations we are now undertaking to treat. It is by using our imaginations to stretch the limits of the system without overstepping its boundaries that we have reached the point where osseointegration is truly becoming a part of our basic armamentarium in the practice of Prosthodontics.</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 72","pages":"48-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incorporation of the Brånemark root-form osseointegrated implant into the practice of Prosthodontics has opened up a new range of treatment options previously unavailable to our patients. No longer limited to their original use in restoring the completely edentulous arch, the role of implants now includes the replacement of one or more missing teeth in partially edentulous situations. Implants may also be incorporated into periodontal prostheses as supplemental support where the number or strength of existing natural abutments is inadequate, and used as a means of salvaging prostheses which have failed as a result of the loss of strategically important abutments. These newer applications, however, combined with patient demands for the optimum in esthetics as well as function, have served to challenge our ingenuity and resourcefulness in this rapidly evolving field. The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of the evolution of our implant experiences in recent years, and to illustrate the ways in which the Brånemark system has been utilized and adapted as the number and complexity of clinical situations have increased. Simply stated, the technical aspects of prosthetic treatment, those involving impression techniques, materials, etc., have remained fairly constant throughout our implant experience. The more dramatic changes have occurred through the utilization of newer components as they have become available, as well as through a growth in our application of the system and in our approach to treatment planning. The Brånemark system has been in use for just over 25 years at this point in time and has proven itself to be reliable, predictable and at the same time versatile enough to admirably meet the challenges placed on us by the new and varied clinical situations we are now undertaking to treat. It is by using our imaginations to stretch the limits of the system without overstepping its boundaries that we have reached the point where osseointegration is truly becoming a part of our basic armamentarium in the practice of Prosthodontics.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[用bramatnemark系统在假肢中进化]。
bramatnemark根状骨整合种植体在口腔修复术中的应用为我们的患者提供了一系列以前无法获得的治疗选择。种植体的作用不再局限于修复完全无牙弓,现在还包括在部分无牙的情况下替换一颗或多颗缺失的牙齿。种植体也可被纳入牙周修复体中,作为现有天然基台数量或强度不足的补充支持,并作为修复因失去重要战略基台而失效的修复体的一种手段。然而,这些新的应用,结合患者对美学和功能的最佳要求,已经在这个快速发展的领域挑战了我们的独创性和足智多谋。本文的目的是概述近年来我们种植体经验的演变,并说明随着临床情况的数量和复杂性的增加,bramatnemark系统被利用和适应的方式。简单地说,假体治疗的技术方面,包括印模技术、材料等,在我们的植入经历中一直保持相当稳定。更戏剧性的变化发生在新组件的使用上,因为它们已经可用,也通过我们对系统的应用和治疗计划的方法的增长。br nemark系统在这一点上已经使用了25年多,并且已经证明了自己是可靠的,可预测的,同时也是通用的,足以令人钦佩地满足我们现在正在治疗的新的和不同的临床情况给我们带来的挑战。正是通过运用我们的想象力,在不超越其界限的情况下,扩展系统的极限,我们已经达到了骨整合真正成为我们在修复学实践中基本装备的一部分的地步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dental Implants and Bone Grafts [Grooved bonded bridges. Protocols for fabrication and bonding]. [Esthetic aspects of crown lengthening]. [Ceramic fracture on large bridges. A restorative solution]. [Removable dentures for children].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1