Cross-Sector Supervision: Which Model?

J. Kremers, D. Schoenmaker, Peter Wierts
{"title":"Cross-Sector Supervision: Which Model?","authors":"J. Kremers, D. Schoenmaker, Peter Wierts","doi":"10.1353/PFS.2003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to take the analysis one step further by focusing on the key question as regards the organizational structure: what are the pros and cons of combining different supervisory activities within one organization? In this context, we start by briefly describing the old and new Dutch supervisory models. The question is: how did we arrive at the new model? To answer this question, we take a closer look at financial market developments. We then compare cross-sector organizational models for financial supervision. We introduce a new framework for comparing these models and apply it to the functional model of the Netherlands and the integrated model of the United Kingdom. While confirming the familiar conclusion that there is no uniform best model,","PeriodicalId":124672,"journal":{"name":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/PFS.2003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to take the analysis one step further by focusing on the key question as regards the organizational structure: what are the pros and cons of combining different supervisory activities within one organization? In this context, we start by briefly describing the old and new Dutch supervisory models. The question is: how did we arrive at the new model? To answer this question, we take a closer look at financial market developments. We then compare cross-sector organizational models for financial supervision. We introduce a new framework for comparing these models and apply it to the functional model of the Netherlands and the integrated model of the United Kingdom. While confirming the familiar conclusion that there is no uniform best model,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨部门监管:哪种模式?
本文的目的是通过关注组织结构的关键问题来进一步分析:在一个组织内结合不同的监督活动的利弊是什么?在此背景下,我们首先简要介绍荷兰新旧监管模式。问题是:我们是如何得出这种新模式的?为了回答这个问题,我们仔细研究一下金融市场的发展。然后,我们比较了金融监管的跨部门组织模式。我们引入了一个新的框架来比较这些模式,并将其应用于荷兰的功能模式和英国的综合模式。在确认没有统一的最佳模型这一熟悉的结论的同时,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tort Liability, Insurance Rates, and the Insurance Cycle Brokers and the Insurance of Non-Verifiable Losses Editors' Summary Extending the Theory to Meet the Practice of Insurance The "Crisis" in Medical Malpractice Insurance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1