Neandertal man was not morphologically handicapped for speech

L. Boë, S. Maeda, J. Heim
{"title":"Neandertal man was not morphologically handicapped for speech","authors":"L. Boë, S. Maeda, J. Heim","doi":"10.1075/EOC.3.1.05BOE","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since Lieberman and Crelin (1971) postulated a theory that Neandertals were speechless species, the speech capability of Neandertals has been a subject of hot debate for over 30 years and remains as a controversial question. These authors claimed that the acquisition of a low laryngeal position during evolution is a necessary condition for having a vowel space large enough to realize the necessary vocalic contrasts for speech. Moreover, Neandertals didn't posses this anatomical base and therefore could not speak, presumably causing their extinction. In this study, we refute Lieberman and Crelin's theory by showing, first with the analysis of biometric data, that the estimated laryngeal position for two Neandertals is relatively high, but not as high as claimed by the two authors. In fact, the length ratio of the pharyngeal cavity to the oral cavity, i.e., an acoustically important parameter, of the Neandertals corresponds to that of a modern female adult or of a child. Second, using an anthropomorphic articulatory model, the potentially maximum vowel space estimated by varying the model morphology from a newborn, a child, a female adult and to a male adult didn't show any relevant variation. We infer then that a Neandertal could have a vowel space no smaller than that of a modern human. Our study is strictly limited to the morphological aspects of the vocal tract. We, therefore, cannot offer any definitive answer to the question whether Neandertals actually spoke or not. But we feel safe saying that Neandertals were not morphologically handicapped for speech.","PeriodicalId":348718,"journal":{"name":"Evolution of Communication","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/EOC.3.1.05BOE","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Since Lieberman and Crelin (1971) postulated a theory that Neandertals were speechless species, the speech capability of Neandertals has been a subject of hot debate for over 30 years and remains as a controversial question. These authors claimed that the acquisition of a low laryngeal position during evolution is a necessary condition for having a vowel space large enough to realize the necessary vocalic contrasts for speech. Moreover, Neandertals didn't posses this anatomical base and therefore could not speak, presumably causing their extinction. In this study, we refute Lieberman and Crelin's theory by showing, first with the analysis of biometric data, that the estimated laryngeal position for two Neandertals is relatively high, but not as high as claimed by the two authors. In fact, the length ratio of the pharyngeal cavity to the oral cavity, i.e., an acoustically important parameter, of the Neandertals corresponds to that of a modern female adult or of a child. Second, using an anthropomorphic articulatory model, the potentially maximum vowel space estimated by varying the model morphology from a newborn, a child, a female adult and to a male adult didn't show any relevant variation. We infer then that a Neandertal could have a vowel space no smaller than that of a modern human. Our study is strictly limited to the morphological aspects of the vocal tract. We, therefore, cannot offer any definitive answer to the question whether Neandertals actually spoke or not. But we feel safe saying that Neandertals were not morphologically handicapped for speech.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼安德特人在形态学上并没有语言障碍
自从Lieberman和Crelin(1971)提出尼安德特人是不会说话的物种的理论以来,尼安德特人的语言能力一直是30多年来争论的热点问题,至今仍是一个有争议的问题。这些作者声称,在进化过程中获得低喉位置是拥有足够大的元音空间以实现语音所需的语音对比的必要条件。此外,尼安德特人没有这种解剖学基础,因此不会说话,这可能导致了他们的灭绝。在这项研究中,我们驳斥了Lieberman和Crelin的理论,首先通过对生物特征数据的分析,表明两个尼安德特人的喉部位置估计相对较高,但没有两位作者声称的那么高。事实上,尼安德特人咽腔与口腔的长度比,即一个声学上重要的参数,与现代成年女性或儿童的长度比相对应。其次,使用拟人发音模型,通过改变新生儿、儿童、成年女性和成年男性的模型形态学来估计潜在的最大元音空间没有显示出任何相关变化。我们据此推断,尼安德特人的元音间距不会比现代人的小。我们的研究严格限于声道的形态学方面。因此,对于尼安德特人是否真的会说话这个问题,我们无法给出任何明确的答案。但我们可以有把握地说,尼安德特人在形态上并没有语言障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acoustic structure and contexts of emission of vocal signals by black lemurs The evolution of functionally referential alarm communication: Multiple adaptations; multiple constraints Estrus Vocalizations in Two Primate Species (Cercocebus Torquatus Atys and Macaca Nemestrina): Evidence for an Effect of Intrasexual Competition Evolution of the form of spoken words The Crying Game: Do Solicitation Displays Advertise Offspring Fitness?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1