Research and development reporting and stock performance: evidence from China

Shuming Bai, Kai S. Koong, Yanni Wang
{"title":"Research and development reporting and stock performance: evidence from China","authors":"Shuming Bai, Kai S. Koong, Yanni Wang","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-08-2022-0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nChina adopted its new Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises No. 6 in 2007, which substantially converges with the International Financial Reporting Standards. It stipulates that firms operating in China shall capitalize development costs provided specific criteria have been met. This paper aims to examine the effects of the new accounting policies of R&D on the value-relevance and stock performance of 36,299 Chinese firms-years from 2007 to 2020.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA comprehensive multi-stage analysis was conducted. Multiple linear regressions were performed on the pooled cross-sectional time-series total R&D, capitalized expenditures, expensed costs and other key financial factors to test for the effects of R&D on the stock prices, contemporaneous stock returns and subsequent stock returns for the full sample, capitalizer sample and expenser sample, respectively.\n\n\nFindings\nFirst, majority of Chinese firms (about 80% of those reported) elect to adopt expensing R&D approach, while about 20% deploys capitalization treatment. Second, key attributes such as size, profitability, leverage and R&D intensity are highly associated with capitalization propensity. Third, current capitalization affects the contemporaneous stock prices and stock returns (priced-in) with yearly volatility. Finally, intertemporal association exists between firms’ expensing costs and subsequent returns due to a delayed reaction.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAs the world largest emerging economy, the results show that research and development information adds value, and capitalizers outperforms expensers in the area of stock performance. This strategy works irrespectively of economic development stage or capital market maturity. The findings call for more capitalization.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-08-2022-0171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose China adopted its new Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises No. 6 in 2007, which substantially converges with the International Financial Reporting Standards. It stipulates that firms operating in China shall capitalize development costs provided specific criteria have been met. This paper aims to examine the effects of the new accounting policies of R&D on the value-relevance and stock performance of 36,299 Chinese firms-years from 2007 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive multi-stage analysis was conducted. Multiple linear regressions were performed on the pooled cross-sectional time-series total R&D, capitalized expenditures, expensed costs and other key financial factors to test for the effects of R&D on the stock prices, contemporaneous stock returns and subsequent stock returns for the full sample, capitalizer sample and expenser sample, respectively. Findings First, majority of Chinese firms (about 80% of those reported) elect to adopt expensing R&D approach, while about 20% deploys capitalization treatment. Second, key attributes such as size, profitability, leverage and R&D intensity are highly associated with capitalization propensity. Third, current capitalization affects the contemporaneous stock prices and stock returns (priced-in) with yearly volatility. Finally, intertemporal association exists between firms’ expensing costs and subsequent returns due to a delayed reaction. Originality/value As the world largest emerging economy, the results show that research and development information adds value, and capitalizers outperforms expensers in the area of stock performance. This strategy works irrespectively of economic development stage or capital market maturity. The findings call for more capitalization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研发报告与股票表现:来自中国的证据
中国于2007年采用了与国际财务报告准则基本趋同的新《企业会计准则第6号》。它规定,在中国经营的企业在满足特定标准的情况下,应当将开发成本资本化。本文旨在研究研发新会计政策对中国36299家公司2007 - 2020年价值相关性和股票绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法进行了全面的多阶段分析。对合并的横断面时间序列总研发、资本化支出、费用化成本和其他关键财务因素进行多元线性回归,分别检验研发对全样本、资本化样本和费用化样本的股价、同期股票收益和后续股票收益的影响。首先,大多数中国公司(约占报告的80%)选择采用费用化研发方法,而约20%的公司采用资本化处理。其次,规模、盈利能力、杠杆率和研发强度等关键属性与资本化倾向高度相关。第三,当前资本化影响同期股票价格和股票回报(定价)与年波动。最后,由于延迟反应,企业的费用成本与后续收益之间存在跨期关联。原创性/价值作为世界上最大的新兴经济体,研究结果表明,研发信息增加了价值,而在股票表现方面,资本化企业的表现优于成本化企业。这种策略与经济发展阶段和资本市场成熟度无关。研究结果呼吁加大资本投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1