Comparison of R134a and R516A’s performance at Different Air Velocities in Two Evaporator Ejector Cooling System

Ümit Işkan, M. Kahraman, M. Di̇rek
{"title":"Comparison of R134a and R516A’s performance at Different Air Velocities in Two Evaporator Ejector Cooling System","authors":"Ümit Işkan, M. Kahraman, M. Di̇rek","doi":"10.17350/hjse19030000293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims experimentally to investigate the performance analysis of R134a and alternative R516A refrigerant in two evaporator ejector cooling system (DEES) at different air velocities of evaporator#1. Firstly, the tests were carried out with R134a refrigerant under steady-state conditions at different air velocities and then repeated with low GWP R516A refrigerant. As the tests were carried out with R134a, higher cooling capacity was achieved at different air velocity values. When the air velocity value was 1.1, 1.7, 2.2, and 2.7 ms-1, the COP value obtained from the tests with R134a was 1%, 2%, 5%, and 4% higher than R516A, respectively. Additionally, test results illustrate that the higher air velocity contributed to increasing performance parameters however higher air velocity than 2.2 ms-1 had a slight effect. Based on this study, it is concluded that R516A performance is convenient to R134a performance and can be alternatively used as a refrigerant in vapor compression refrigeration systems(BSS).","PeriodicalId":285705,"journal":{"name":"Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hittite Journal of Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17350/hjse19030000293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims experimentally to investigate the performance analysis of R134a and alternative R516A refrigerant in two evaporator ejector cooling system (DEES) at different air velocities of evaporator#1. Firstly, the tests were carried out with R134a refrigerant under steady-state conditions at different air velocities and then repeated with low GWP R516A refrigerant. As the tests were carried out with R134a, higher cooling capacity was achieved at different air velocity values. When the air velocity value was 1.1, 1.7, 2.2, and 2.7 ms-1, the COP value obtained from the tests with R134a was 1%, 2%, 5%, and 4% higher than R516A, respectively. Additionally, test results illustrate that the higher air velocity contributed to increasing performance parameters however higher air velocity than 2.2 ms-1 had a slight effect. Based on this study, it is concluded that R516A performance is convenient to R134a performance and can be alternatively used as a refrigerant in vapor compression refrigeration systems(BSS).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
R134a和R516A在两种蒸发器喷射冷却系统中不同风速下的性能比较
实验研究了R134a和R516A替代制冷剂在1号蒸发器喷射冷却系统(DEES)中不同风速下的性能分析。首先用R134a制冷剂在不同风速下进行稳态试验,然后用低GWP值的R516A制冷剂进行重复试验。采用R134a进行试验,在不同的风速值下获得了较高的制冷量。当风速为1.1、1.7、2.2和2.7 ms-1时,R134a的COP值分别比R516A高1%、2%、5%和4%。此外,试验结果表明,较高的风速有助于提高性能参数,但高于2.2 ms-1的风速对性能参数的影响较小。综上所述,R516A性能优于R134a性能,可作为蒸汽压缩制冷系统(BSS)的替代制冷剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Research: Investigation of Financial Applications with Blockchain Technology COVID-19 Diagnosis from Blood Gas Using Multivariate Linear Regression A Fabrication Method for Memristors with Graphene Top Electrodes and their Characterization Size Dependent Compressive Strength of FIB Machined Single Crystal Manganese Pillars Performance Comparison of Waste Cooking Oil on Coal Slime Flotation with Sunflower Oil and Gas Oil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1