Associating Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Teaching Formats with Situational Interest and Motivation

Elizabeth Simmermeyer, M. Erickson, Stefanie Walsh, Elizabeth Karcher
{"title":"Associating Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Teaching Formats with Situational Interest and Motivation","authors":"Elizabeth Simmermeyer, M. Erickson, Stefanie Walsh, Elizabeth Karcher","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, instructors across the world faced the uncertainty and challenge of retaining student engagement after transitioning from face-to-face to emergency remote instruction. Yet, few studies have evaluated student interest and motivation in the various learning formats during emergency remote learning conditions. The current study examines student situational interest and situational motivation with three emergency remote teaching formats. In Fall 2020, a previously face-to-face introductory animal science course was taught fully-remote. Each week, students participated in a 50-minute synchronous lecture (SLec) together, a 50 minutes of asynchronous lecture (ALec), and a 70-minute synchronous lab (Lab). We assessed situational interest and situational motivation in SLec, Alec, and Lab during weeks 6 and 10. Using linear mixed effects modeling, students demonstrated greater situational interest, attention demand, instant enjoyment, novelty, and total interest in SLec and Lab compared with ALec. Intrinsic motivation was higher and external regulation was lower in Lab and SLec compared with ALec. Students reported greater amotivation and decreased identified regulation with the ALec compared with Lab. Our results, although limited to one course, suggest that synchronous remote formats are associated with greater student interest and intrinsic motivation compared with asynchronous formats.","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, instructors across the world faced the uncertainty and challenge of retaining student engagement after transitioning from face-to-face to emergency remote instruction. Yet, few studies have evaluated student interest and motivation in the various learning formats during emergency remote learning conditions. The current study examines student situational interest and situational motivation with three emergency remote teaching formats. In Fall 2020, a previously face-to-face introductory animal science course was taught fully-remote. Each week, students participated in a 50-minute synchronous lecture (SLec) together, a 50 minutes of asynchronous lecture (ALec), and a 70-minute synchronous lab (Lab). We assessed situational interest and situational motivation in SLec, Alec, and Lab during weeks 6 and 10. Using linear mixed effects modeling, students demonstrated greater situational interest, attention demand, instant enjoyment, novelty, and total interest in SLec and Lab compared with ALec. Intrinsic motivation was higher and external regulation was lower in Lab and SLec compared with ALec. Students reported greater amotivation and decreased identified regulation with the ALec compared with Lab. Our results, although limited to one course, suggest that synchronous remote formats are associated with greater student interest and intrinsic motivation compared with asynchronous formats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将同步和异步远程教学形式与情境兴趣和动机联系起来
为应对全球COVID-19大流行,世界各地的教师在从面对面教学转向紧急远程教学后,面临着保持学生参与度的不确定性和挑战。然而,很少有研究评估在紧急远程学习条件下各种学习形式下学生的兴趣和动机。本研究以三种紧急远程教学形式考察学生情境兴趣和情境动机。2020年秋季,一门以前面对面的动物科学入门课程被完全远程授课。每周,学生们一起参加50分钟的同步讲座(SLec), 50分钟的异步讲座(ALec)和70分钟的同步实验(lab)。在第6周和第10周,我们对学生的情境兴趣和情境动机进行了评估。运用线性混合效应模型,学生表现出更大的情境兴趣、注意需求、即时享受、新颖性和对SLec和实验室的总体兴趣。与ALec相比,Lab和SLec的内在动机更高,外部调节更低。与实验室相比,学生报告ALec的动机更强,识别规则更少。我们的研究结果,虽然仅限于一门课程,但表明与异步格式相比,同步远程格式与更大的学生兴趣和内在动机相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Students’ Decisions to Engage in International Education Opportunities Post-COVID Study Abroad Programs and Student Stress: An Animal Science Curriculum Case Study Cyberbiosecurity Workforce Preparation From Reel to Real: Practical Tips for Implementing Inductive Learning with Film Examining Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Flipped Introductory Agricultural Mechanics Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1