{"title":"Object of legal relations in the field of venture investment into innovation activity","authors":"Yurii Zhornokui, Iryna Podrez-Riapolova","doi":"10.37772/2518-1718-2022-1(37)-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem setting. The basis of carrying out venture investment into innovation activity is a creative search for opportunities to establish the objective truth of certain processes and, if possible, their implementation into industrial production. Therefore, one can determine by using legislative norms on intellectual property the persons who own the result of intellectual creative activity, embodied into a certain objective form (a patent, a certificate, etc.). However, it is often emphasized, except the objects of industrial property rights, that the objects of venture investment into innovation activity are innovative products or technologies. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The modern research situation of the selected issues indicates the imperfection of the current legislation and the lack of legal doctrine in the context of determining the objects of legal relations of venture investment into innovation activity. Doctrinal developments of domestic and foreign experts, such as Yu. Ye. Atamanov, K. M. Vrublevska-Misiuna, V. P. Kokhan, O. E. Simson, F. Pinkow, J. Iversen, although contain analysis and arguments in favor of a certain scientific approach in the context of understanding the outlined issue, but do not give an unambiguous answer. Significant scientific achievements in considering the development of startups by business incubators and venture financing of startups is the work of O.V. Rozghon. Target of research. The objective of the article is to clarify the issue of determining the object of venture investment into innovation activity. Article’s main body. The author of the research argues against the recognition of innovative products and technologies as the object of venture investment into innovation activity, because: 1) innovative product is only the result of production activities (secondary, derivative object), when there is already the object (the object of intellectual property law) having the security document; such a product can be discussed in the context of the characteristics of quality components of the products, taking into account the implementation of a new object of industrial property rights into the innovation process; 2) the concept of technology as an object contained in the legislation of Ukraine and legal doctrine is rather vague and does not clearly answer the question on understanding the object of researched legal relations, since it is mostly a generalizing concept that covers the entire range of relations taking place in the chain of the innovation process. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The purpose of the activity of the objects of venture investment into innovation activity is to create an object of intellectual, creative activity, i.e. the creation of venture entrepreneurship object, which includes inventions, utility models and other innovations, the creation of which are carried out with a certain risk. The interest of the subjects of innovation activity is the positive results of scientific and technical, engineering developments, the result of which is the creation of an object of intellectual creative activity embodied in a certain objective form (a patent, a certificate, etc.). Accordingly, the object of venture investment into innovation activity is property rights to the intellectual product embodied into the material carrier, which is created as a result of basic and applied scientific research, the results of which have practical applicability, mostly industrial one.","PeriodicalId":133481,"journal":{"name":"Law and innovations","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2022-1(37)-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem setting. The basis of carrying out venture investment into innovation activity is a creative search for opportunities to establish the objective truth of certain processes and, if possible, their implementation into industrial production. Therefore, one can determine by using legislative norms on intellectual property the persons who own the result of intellectual creative activity, embodied into a certain objective form (a patent, a certificate, etc.). However, it is often emphasized, except the objects of industrial property rights, that the objects of venture investment into innovation activity are innovative products or technologies. Analysis of recent researches and publications. The modern research situation of the selected issues indicates the imperfection of the current legislation and the lack of legal doctrine in the context of determining the objects of legal relations of venture investment into innovation activity. Doctrinal developments of domestic and foreign experts, such as Yu. Ye. Atamanov, K. M. Vrublevska-Misiuna, V. P. Kokhan, O. E. Simson, F. Pinkow, J. Iversen, although contain analysis and arguments in favor of a certain scientific approach in the context of understanding the outlined issue, but do not give an unambiguous answer. Significant scientific achievements in considering the development of startups by business incubators and venture financing of startups is the work of O.V. Rozghon. Target of research. The objective of the article is to clarify the issue of determining the object of venture investment into innovation activity. Article’s main body. The author of the research argues against the recognition of innovative products and technologies as the object of venture investment into innovation activity, because: 1) innovative product is only the result of production activities (secondary, derivative object), when there is already the object (the object of intellectual property law) having the security document; such a product can be discussed in the context of the characteristics of quality components of the products, taking into account the implementation of a new object of industrial property rights into the innovation process; 2) the concept of technology as an object contained in the legislation of Ukraine and legal doctrine is rather vague and does not clearly answer the question on understanding the object of researched legal relations, since it is mostly a generalizing concept that covers the entire range of relations taking place in the chain of the innovation process. Conclusions and prospects for the development. The purpose of the activity of the objects of venture investment into innovation activity is to create an object of intellectual, creative activity, i.e. the creation of venture entrepreneurship object, which includes inventions, utility models and other innovations, the creation of which are carried out with a certain risk. The interest of the subjects of innovation activity is the positive results of scientific and technical, engineering developments, the result of which is the creation of an object of intellectual creative activity embodied in a certain objective form (a patent, a certificate, etc.). Accordingly, the object of venture investment into innovation activity is property rights to the intellectual product embodied into the material carrier, which is created as a result of basic and applied scientific research, the results of which have practical applicability, mostly industrial one.
问题设置。对创新活动进行风险投资的基础是创造性地寻找机会,以确定某些过程的客观真理,并在可能的情况下将其实施到工业生产中。因此,人们可以利用知识产权的立法规范来确定谁拥有智力创造活动的成果,这些成果体现为某种客观形式(专利、证书等)。然而,人们经常强调,除了工业产权的客体之外,风险投资进入创新活动的客体是创新产品或技术。分析最近的研究和出版物。所选问题的现代研究现状表明,在确定风险投资创新活动法律关系对象的背景下,现行立法的不完善和法律理论的缺失。理论发展的国内外专家,如余。你们。Atamanov, K. M. Vrublevska-Misiuna, V. P. Kokhan, O. E. Simson, F. Pinkow, J. Iversen,虽然在理解概述问题的背景下包含有利于某种科学方法的分析和论据,但没有给出明确的答案。在考虑创业孵化器对创业公司的发展和创业公司的风险融资方面,O.V. Rozghon的工作取得了重大的科学成果。研究目标。本文的目的是澄清风险投资进入创新活动的客体确定问题。文章的主体。本文作者反对将创新产品和技术认定为创新活动的风险投资对象,因为:1)创新产品只是生产活动的结果(次要、衍生对象),而客体(知识产权法客体)已经有了担保文件;这样的产品可以在讨论产品质量的特点的背景下,考虑到实施一个新的工业产权客体进入创新过程;2)乌克兰立法和法律学说中所包含的技术作为客体的概念相当模糊,并不能明确回答理解所研究的法律关系客体的问题,因为它大多是一个泛化的概念,涵盖了创新过程链中发生的所有关系。结论及发展展望。将风险投资对象的活动转化为创新活动的目的是创造一个具有智力、创造性的活动对象,即创造风险创业对象,其中包括发明、实用新型等创新,其创造是带着一定的风险进行的。创新活动主体的利益是科学技术和工程发展的积极结果,其结果是创造了以某种客观形式(专利、证书等)体现的智力创新活动对象。因此,创新活动风险投资的对象是体现在物质载体上的知识产品的产权,这些知识产品是基础科学研究和应用科学研究创造出来的,其成果具有实际的应用性,主要是工业应用性。