STATUS EFFECT ON CHILDREN OUTSIDE MARRIED STATUS AFTER CONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS COURT DECISION

S. Sulaiman
{"title":"STATUS EFFECT ON CHILDREN OUTSIDE MARRIED STATUS AFTER CONSTITUTIONAL RELIGIOUS COURT DECISION","authors":"S. Sulaiman","doi":"10.30659/akta.v8i2.7924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study as follows 1) To identify and explain Child outside influence married status of the right to inherit after the Constitutional Court decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari, 2) To identify and explain the barriers outside the married status of children of the right to inherit after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari, 3) To identify and explain solutions to overcome barriers outside the married status of children of the right to inherit after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari. The method used by researchers is sociological approach juridical law and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. The sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with interview Religious Court Judge in Kendari. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. Based on the results of the research are In terms of inheritance after the court ruling, the position of a child outside of married as intended by the constitutional court decision outside the married is not the same child with the natural child, has been gaining street or space to get recognition for the sake of protection of the rights of the child outside the married. In this case the Constitutional Court to decide Article 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on children outside of married, deserved to be recognized by the biological father and is also entitled to inheritance equal to the other children. Constraints in this Constitutional Court decision is a matter of perspective among law enforcement and government officials to give up the rights to illegitimate children are no different treatment or other discriminatory treatment.","PeriodicalId":190203,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akta","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v8i2.7924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this study as follows 1) To identify and explain Child outside influence married status of the right to inherit after the Constitutional Court decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari, 2) To identify and explain the barriers outside the married status of children of the right to inherit after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari, 3) To identify and explain solutions to overcome barriers outside the married status of children of the right to inherit after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 in the Religious Court Kendari. The method used by researchers is sociological approach juridical law and specification in this study were included descriptive analysis. The sources and types of data in this study are primary data obtained from field studies with interview Religious Court Judge in Kendari. And secondary data obtained from the study of literature. Based on the results of the research are In terms of inheritance after the court ruling, the position of a child outside of married as intended by the constitutional court decision outside the married is not the same child with the natural child, has been gaining street or space to get recognition for the sake of protection of the rights of the child outside the married. In this case the Constitutional Court to decide Article 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on children outside of married, deserved to be recognized by the biological father and is also entitled to inheritance equal to the other children. Constraints in this Constitutional Court decision is a matter of perspective among law enforcement and government officials to give up the rights to illegitimate children are no different treatment or other discriminatory treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法宗教法院判决后身份对非婚子女的影响
本研究的目的如下:1)识别和解释宪法法院第46/PUU-VIII/2010号宗教法院判决后,婚姻地位对儿童继承权的外部影响;2)识别和解释宪法法院第46/PUU-VIII/2010号宗教法院判决后,婚姻地位之外的儿童继承权的障碍;3)根据宪法法院第46/PUU-VIII/2010号宪法法院在肯达里宗教法院作出的决定,确定和解释克服儿童婚姻地位以外的继承权障碍的解决办法。研究者使用的方法是社会学方法,在本研究中包括了法律和规范的描述性分析。本研究的数据来源和类型均为对肯达里宗教法院法官进行实地调查获得的原始数据。以及从文献研究中获得的二手数据。根据调查结果,在法院判决后的继承方面,宪法法院判决中所主张的“婚外子女与亲生子女不是同一子女”的地位,为了保护婚外子女的权利,正在获得认可。在这种情况下,宪法法院决定第46/PUU-VIII/2010条关于婚外子女的规定,应得到亲生父亲的承认,并有权享有与其他子女平等的继承权。宪法法院的这一判决限制了执法人员和政府官员对放弃非婚生子女的权利的看法,并没有区别对待或其他歧视性待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Re-Narrate the Relevance of Justice in Debtor Protection Related to the Parate Execution Carried Out by Separatist Creditors The Predatory Pricing Practice: The Challenges of Business Competition Law on Ride-Hailing Tariff’s War The Legal Implications of Forgery Sale & Purchase Binding Agreement by Notary Public The Implementation of Legal Position Regulation of Head of Services/Agency in Local Government The Implementation of a Complete Systematic Land Registration Program to Realize Legal Protection and Public Welfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1