Assessing a 600-mg Loading Dose of Clopidogrel 24 Hours Prior to Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment

E. Atallah, H. Saad, K. Bekelis, N. Chalouhi, S. Tjoumakaris, D. Hasan, H. Zarzour, Michelle J. Smith, Md Mba Facs Faha Robert H. Rosenwasswer, P. Jabbour
{"title":"Assessing a 600-mg Loading Dose of Clopidogrel 24 Hours Prior to Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment","authors":"E. Atallah, H. Saad, K. Bekelis, N. Chalouhi, S. Tjoumakaris, D. Hasan, H. Zarzour, Michelle J. Smith, Md Mba Facs Faha Robert H. Rosenwasswer, P. Jabbour","doi":"10.29046/JHNJ.013.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clopidogrel/aspirin antiplatelet therapy routinely is administered 7-10 days before pipeline aneurysm treatment. Our study assessed the safety and efficacy of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel 24 hours before Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) treatment. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients treated with PED from October 2010 to May 2016. A total of 39.7% (n = 158) of patients were dispensed a loading dose of 650 mg of aspirin plus at least 600 mg of clopidogrel 24 hours preceding PED deployment, compared to 60.3% (n = 240) of patients who received 81-325 mg of aspirin daily for 10 days with 75 mg of clopidogrel daily preprocedurally. The mean follow-up was 15.8 months (standard deviation [SD] 12.4 months). modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was registered before the discharge and at each follow-up visit. To control confounding, we used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score conditioning. Results: Of 398 patients, the proportion of female patients was ~16.5% (41/240) in both groups and shared the same mean of age ~56.46 years. ~12.2% (mean = 0.09; SD = 0.30) had a subarachnoid hemorrhage. 92% (mean = 0.29; SD = 0.70) from the pretreatment group and 85.7% (mean = 0.44; SD = 0.91) of the bolus group had a mRS ≤2. In multivariate analysis, bolus did not affect the mRS score, P = 0.24. Seven patients had a long-term recurrence, 2 (0.83%; mean = 0.01; SD = 0.10) of which from the pretreatment group. In a multivariable logistic regression, bolus was not associated with a long-term recurrence rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-13.50; P = 0.52) or with thromboembolic accidents (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96-1.03; P = 0.83) nor with hemorrhagic events (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.97-1.03; P = 0.99). Three patients died: one who received a bolus had an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. The mean mortality rate was parallel in both groups ~0.25 (SD = 0.16). Bolus was not associated with mortality (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.26-4.65; P = 0.89). The same associations were present in propensity score-adjusted models.","PeriodicalId":355574,"journal":{"name":"JHN Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHN Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29046/JHNJ.013.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clopidogrel/aspirin antiplatelet therapy routinely is administered 7-10 days before pipeline aneurysm treatment. Our study assessed the safety and efficacy of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel 24 hours before Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) treatment. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients treated with PED from October 2010 to May 2016. A total of 39.7% (n = 158) of patients were dispensed a loading dose of 650 mg of aspirin plus at least 600 mg of clopidogrel 24 hours preceding PED deployment, compared to 60.3% (n = 240) of patients who received 81-325 mg of aspirin daily for 10 days with 75 mg of clopidogrel daily preprocedurally. The mean follow-up was 15.8 months (standard deviation [SD] 12.4 months). modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was registered before the discharge and at each follow-up visit. To control confounding, we used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score conditioning. Results: Of 398 patients, the proportion of female patients was ~16.5% (41/240) in both groups and shared the same mean of age ~56.46 years. ~12.2% (mean = 0.09; SD = 0.30) had a subarachnoid hemorrhage. 92% (mean = 0.29; SD = 0.70) from the pretreatment group and 85.7% (mean = 0.44; SD = 0.91) of the bolus group had a mRS ≤2. In multivariate analysis, bolus did not affect the mRS score, P = 0.24. Seven patients had a long-term recurrence, 2 (0.83%; mean = 0.01; SD = 0.10) of which from the pretreatment group. In a multivariable logistic regression, bolus was not associated with a long-term recurrence rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-13.50; P = 0.52) or with thromboembolic accidents (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96-1.03; P = 0.83) nor with hemorrhagic events (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.97-1.03; P = 0.99). Three patients died: one who received a bolus had an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. The mean mortality rate was parallel in both groups ~0.25 (SD = 0.16). Bolus was not associated with mortality (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.26-4.65; P = 0.89). The same associations were present in propensity score-adjusted models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估管道栓塞装置治疗前24小时600mg氯吡格雷负荷剂量
背景:氯吡格雷/阿司匹林抗血小板治疗通常在管道动脉瘤治疗前7-10天进行。我们的研究评估了在管道栓塞装置(PED)治疗前24小时使用600mg负荷剂量氯吡格雷的安全性和有效性。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了2010年10月至2016年5月期间接受PED治疗的患者。共有39.7% (n = 158)的患者在PED部署前24小时分配了650 mg阿司匹林和至少600 mg氯吡格雷的负荷剂量,相比之下,60.3% (n = 240)的患者在术前每天接受81-325 mg阿司匹林和75 mg氯吡格雷,持续10天。平均随访15.8个月(标准差12.4个月)。在出院前和每次随访时登记改良Rankin量表(mRS)。为了控制混杂,我们使用了多变量逻辑回归和倾向评分条件反射。结果:398例患者中,两组女性患者所占比例为~16.5%(41/240),平均年龄为~56.46岁。~12.2%(平均= 0.09;SD = 0.30)有蛛网膜下腔出血。92%(平均= 0.29;SD = 0.70), 85.7%(平均= 0.44;SD = 0.91)的大剂量组mRS≤2。在多因素分析中,丸剂对mRS评分无影响,P = 0.24。长期复发7例,2例(0.83%;平均值= 0.01;SD = 0.10),与预处理组比较。在多变量logistic回归中,bolus与长期复发率无关(比值比[OR] 1.91;95%置信区间[CI] 0.27-13.50;P = 0.52)或血栓栓塞事故(or 0.99;95% ci 0.96-1.03;P = 0.83)与出血事件无关(OR 1.00;95% ci 0.97-1.03;P = 0.99)。三名患者死亡:其中一名接受静脉注射的患者出现急性蛛网膜下腔出血。两组患者的平均死亡率相当~0.25 (SD = 0.16)。Bolus与死亡率无关(OR 1.11;95% ci 0.26-4.65;P = 0.89)。同样的关联也存在于倾向得分调整模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spinal Cord Injury: Current and Novel Treatment Strategies Multiple Contiguous-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasties: Unique Considerations Sacroiliac Joint Fusion – Impact of a New Image-Guidance Protocol on Safety and Complications Minimal Access Expandable Mesh Device for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Case Series Spinal Cord Stimulation in the 21st Century — Reviewing Innovation in Neuromodulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1