EVOLUTION OF GINA GUIDELINES. PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ASTHMA MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF CLINICAL TRIALS

S. Zaikov, F. T. Bogomolov, G. Gumeniuk
{"title":"EVOLUTION OF GINA GUIDELINES. PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ASTHMA MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF CLINICAL TRIALS","authors":"S. Zaikov, F. T. Bogomolov, G. Gumeniuk","doi":"10.31215/2306-4927-2022-30-1-6-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"EVOLUTION OF GINA GUIDELINES. PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ASTHMA MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF CLINICAL TRIALS S. V. Zaikov, F. T. Bogomolov, G. L. Gumeniuk Abstract Through the 28 years lifetime of GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) recommendations, there’s been a shift in the paradigm of asthma management. GINA is a Global Strategy of treatment and prophylaxis of asthma, established by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in collaboration with National Institute of Health and World Health Organization in 1993. First published in 1995 GINA report has become a widespread consensus, which made a basis for clinical recommendations on asthma worldwide. One can define three major periods in evolution of GINA. The first period covered 1994–2004 years since GINA originated and first edition published until experts have recognized the advantage of inhaled rout of asthma drugs administration. It was proved that in many patients the main goal was establishing asthma control, while combination of inhaled corticosteroid with long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) was a preferred option in moderate persistent asthma. In this period it was recommended to chose an approach to managent of asthma, based on scientific evidence, rather then expert’s opinion. In this regard, a second period (2005–2014 years) should be considered outstanding, due to the change in perception of major goals of asthma management, considering exclusively data from numerous studies. Such concepts as patient-medical personnel partnership, patient’s education, guided self-control and goals of treatment have been introduced. GINA recommends to use asthma control as a major approach to treatment instead of severity of disease. Personalized treatment should be aimed on exacerbation risk reduction. Steps 3-5 of treatment algorithm were modified to include ISC-formoterol for maintenance therapy and relief of symptoms (MART-therapy). Third period of GINA started after SYGMA 1 and 2 studies results became available. It was demonstrated that on-demand symptom-relief use of anti-inflammatory therapy with ICS/formoterol combination was highly effective in mild asthma patients. Use of this combination as rescue medication decreased the risk of exacerbation in comparison with short-acting beta agonist (SABA) and may be used in any variant of asthma. Since GINA 2019 edition SABA became not the only one available option even for the mildest forms of asthma. Eventually, in 2021 the culmination of GINA evolution occurred: major algorithm of asthma management has been divided in two tracks: preferred (Track 1) therapy with ICS/formoterol and alternative (track 2) therapy with SABA as rescue medication. The authors of this article review in details the periods of GINA evolution, resulted in dividing asthma management into two tracks, which provide personalized treatment strategy considering all patient’s needs and characteristics such as fast relief of symptoms, decreased risk of exacerbation and establishing asthma control. Key words: asthma, GINA, evolution of treatment approaches. Ukr. Pulmonol. J. 2022;30(1):6–14","PeriodicalId":328937,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Pulmonology Journal","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Pulmonology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31215/2306-4927-2022-30-1-6-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

EVOLUTION OF GINA GUIDELINES. PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ASTHMA MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF CLINICAL TRIALS S. V. Zaikov, F. T. Bogomolov, G. L. Gumeniuk Abstract Through the 28 years lifetime of GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) recommendations, there’s been a shift in the paradigm of asthma management. GINA is a Global Strategy of treatment and prophylaxis of asthma, established by National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in collaboration with National Institute of Health and World Health Organization in 1993. First published in 1995 GINA report has become a widespread consensus, which made a basis for clinical recommendations on asthma worldwide. One can define three major periods in evolution of GINA. The first period covered 1994–2004 years since GINA originated and first edition published until experts have recognized the advantage of inhaled rout of asthma drugs administration. It was proved that in many patients the main goal was establishing asthma control, while combination of inhaled corticosteroid with long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) was a preferred option in moderate persistent asthma. In this period it was recommended to chose an approach to managent of asthma, based on scientific evidence, rather then expert’s opinion. In this regard, a second period (2005–2014 years) should be considered outstanding, due to the change in perception of major goals of asthma management, considering exclusively data from numerous studies. Such concepts as patient-medical personnel partnership, patient’s education, guided self-control and goals of treatment have been introduced. GINA recommends to use asthma control as a major approach to treatment instead of severity of disease. Personalized treatment should be aimed on exacerbation risk reduction. Steps 3-5 of treatment algorithm were modified to include ISC-formoterol for maintenance therapy and relief of symptoms (MART-therapy). Third period of GINA started after SYGMA 1 and 2 studies results became available. It was demonstrated that on-demand symptom-relief use of anti-inflammatory therapy with ICS/formoterol combination was highly effective in mild asthma patients. Use of this combination as rescue medication decreased the risk of exacerbation in comparison with short-acting beta agonist (SABA) and may be used in any variant of asthma. Since GINA 2019 edition SABA became not the only one available option even for the mildest forms of asthma. Eventually, in 2021 the culmination of GINA evolution occurred: major algorithm of asthma management has been divided in two tracks: preferred (Track 1) therapy with ICS/formoterol and alternative (track 2) therapy with SABA as rescue medication. The authors of this article review in details the periods of GINA evolution, resulted in dividing asthma management into two tracks, which provide personalized treatment strategy considering all patient’s needs and characteristics such as fast relief of symptoms, decreased risk of exacerbation and establishing asthma control. Key words: asthma, GINA, evolution of treatment approaches. Ukr. Pulmonol. J. 2022;30(1):6–14
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gina指导方针的演变。通过临床试验的棱镜哮喘管理的实际方面
Gina指导方针的演变。通过GINA(全球哮喘倡议)建议的28年生命周期,哮喘管理的范式发生了转变。GINA是一项治疗和预防哮喘的全球战略,由国家心脏、肺和血液研究所与国家卫生研究所和世界卫生组织于1993年合作制定。GINA报告于1995年首次发表,已成为广泛共识,为全球哮喘临床建议奠定了基础。GINA的演变可以划分为三个主要阶段。第一个时期是1994-2004年,从GINA的起源和第一版出版到专家们认识到吸入哮喘药物给药的优势。事实证明,在许多患者中,主要目标是建立哮喘控制,而吸入皮质类固醇联合长效β受体激动剂(ICS/LABA)是中度持续性哮喘的首选方案。在这一时期,人们建议根据科学证据,而不是专家的意见,选择一种治疗哮喘的方法。在这方面,第二个阶段(2005-2014年)应该被认为是突出的,因为对哮喘管理主要目标的看法发生了变化,只考虑了大量研究的数据。介绍了医患伙伴关系、患者教育、引导自我控制和治疗目标等概念。GINA建议将哮喘控制作为治疗的主要方法,而不是疾病的严重程度。个体化治疗应以降低恶化风险为目标。修改治疗算法的步骤3-5,加入isc -福莫特罗用于维持治疗和缓解症状(mart治疗)。第三期GINA开始于SYGMA 1和SYGMA 2研究结果公布后。结果表明,在轻度哮喘患者中,按需使用ICS/福莫特罗联合抗炎治疗缓解症状是非常有效的。与短效β受体激动剂(SABA)相比,将该联合用药作为抢救药物可降低病情恶化的风险,并可用于任何类型的哮喘。自GINA 2019版以来,即使是最轻微的哮喘形式,SABA也不是唯一可用的选择。最终,在2021年,GINA进化达到了高潮:哮喘管理的主要算法分为两个方向:首选(轨道1)治疗,使用ICS/福莫特罗,替代(轨道2)治疗,使用SABA作为救援药物。本文作者详细回顾了GINA的发展阶段,将哮喘管理分为两个轨道,提供个性化的治疗策略,考虑到所有患者的需求和特征,如快速缓解症状,降低恶化风险和建立哮喘控制。关键词:哮喘,GINA,治疗方法演变Ukr。Pulmonol。j . 2022; 30(1): 6日至14日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PECULIARITIES OF THE COURSE OF COPD IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT A46G (RS1042713) ALLELES OF ADRB2 GENE IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS AND PROGRESSIVE PULMONARY FIBROSIS IN ADULTS: ADAPTED EVIDENCE-BASED CLINICAL GUIDELINE (DRAFT) TRAUMATIC PNEUMONITIS DUE TO COMBAT CHEST INJURY AS A RISK FACTOR FOR PNEUMONIA COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DENSITOMETRY OF THE LUNGS IN THE ALGORITHM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASES, INCLUDING OCCUPATIONAL AND ECOLOGICAL DISEASES THE CASE OF COVID-19 WITH ATYPICAL PULMONARY LESIONS AND A LIFETIME HISTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1