Preparing Priests to Lead Parish Schools: Concerns and Recommendations

Thomas A Simonds S.J., T. Cook, Maximilian Engel, Ronald D Fussell, Jean Hearn, Jerry Meyer
{"title":"Preparing Priests to Lead Parish Schools: Concerns and Recommendations","authors":"Thomas A Simonds S.J., T. Cook, Maximilian Engel, Ronald D Fussell, Jean Hearn, Jerry Meyer","doi":"10.15365/JOCE.2401072021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canon law recognizes the pastor as the chief educational officer (CEO) of the parish school. However, recent studies demonstrate that seminaries do not prepare seminarians for work in or leadership of Catholic schools, and recent scholarship also demonstrates that an increasing number of seminarians lack the desire to lead a parish school. Our research study examined the post-seminary preparation of priests for leadership of parish schools. We also explored alternative governancemodels for Catholic schools. We conducted structured interviews with 10 national leaders to explore these two areas of interest. Our findings demonstrate that preparation of newly ordained and veteran priests for parish school leadership is woefully inadequate. Interviewees suggested that the pastor/principal relationship and school finance are two important topics that should be addressed in best practice preparation programs for school leaders. All 10 interviewees had difficulty imagining alternative governance models for schools in which the pastor would not serve as the CEO, but at the same time, some of the participants could see potential benefits of alternative governance models. Based on the findings of our study, we recommend that: (1) seminary programs include an initial introduction to the importance of Catholic schools for evangelization; (2) a new national model for preparing young and veteran priests for school leadership be developed and implemented; (3) existing best practices for alternative governance models be collated and promulgated; and (4) church leaders and stakeholders determine the best governance models for their schools and then prepare the appropriate people for leadership roles accordingly.","PeriodicalId":248502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Catholic Education","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Catholic Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15365/JOCE.2401072021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canon law recognizes the pastor as the chief educational officer (CEO) of the parish school. However, recent studies demonstrate that seminaries do not prepare seminarians for work in or leadership of Catholic schools, and recent scholarship also demonstrates that an increasing number of seminarians lack the desire to lead a parish school. Our research study examined the post-seminary preparation of priests for leadership of parish schools. We also explored alternative governancemodels for Catholic schools. We conducted structured interviews with 10 national leaders to explore these two areas of interest. Our findings demonstrate that preparation of newly ordained and veteran priests for parish school leadership is woefully inadequate. Interviewees suggested that the pastor/principal relationship and school finance are two important topics that should be addressed in best practice preparation programs for school leaders. All 10 interviewees had difficulty imagining alternative governance models for schools in which the pastor would not serve as the CEO, but at the same time, some of the participants could see potential benefits of alternative governance models. Based on the findings of our study, we recommend that: (1) seminary programs include an initial introduction to the importance of Catholic schools for evangelization; (2) a new national model for preparing young and veteran priests for school leadership be developed and implemented; (3) existing best practices for alternative governance models be collated and promulgated; and (4) church leaders and stakeholders determine the best governance models for their schools and then prepare the appropriate people for leadership roles accordingly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准备神父领导堂区学校:关注与建议
教会法承认牧师是教区学校的首席教育官(CEO)。然而,最近的研究表明,神学院并没有为神学院学生在天主教学校的工作或领导做准备,最近的学术研究也表明,越来越多的神学院学生缺乏领导教区学校的愿望。我们的研究考察了神父升学后为教区学校领导所做的准备。我们还探讨了天主教学校的其他管理模式。我们对10位国家领导人进行了结构化访谈,以探讨这两个感兴趣的领域。我们的调查结果表明,为教区学校领导准备新任命和资深牧师是严重不足的。受访者建议,牧师/校长关系和学校财务是学校领导最佳实践准备项目中应该解决的两个重要主题。所有10位受访者都难以想象牧师不担任首席执行官的其他学校治理模式,但与此同时,一些参与者可以看到替代治理模式的潜在好处。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议:(1)神学院课程包括初步介绍天主教学校对福传的重要性;(2)制定和实施一种新的国家模式,培养年轻和资深牧师担任学校领导;(3)整理和公布不同管治模式的现有最佳实践;(4)教会领袖和利益相关者为他们的学校确定最佳治理模式,然后为相应的领导角色准备合适的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the 8th Day: A Catholic Theology of Sport The Beam in Our Own Eyes: Antiracism and YA Literature Through a Catholic Lens Data at the Diocesan Level: Common Data Practices and Challenges Among U.S. Catholic School Superintendents Exclusionary Discipline in Early Childhood Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Principal Time Usage and Ohio's EdChoice Scholarship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1