Telegram: deconstructing one of the biggest blockchain cases of 2020

Robert A. Jr. Musiala, J. J. Harrington, Teresa Goody Guillén, Jonathan A. Forman, Adam D. Gale, V. Reynolds
{"title":"Telegram: deconstructing one of the biggest blockchain cases of 2020","authors":"Robert A. Jr. Musiala, J. J. Harrington, Teresa Goody Guillén, Jonathan A. Forman, Adam D. Gale, V. Reynolds","doi":"10.1108/joic-10-2020-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 The Telegram case is arguably the most important case of 2020 involving the legal classification of blockchain-based digital assets. Because it is often cost-prohibitive for companies to challenge the government in court, the Telegram litigation offered a unique opportunity for the parties to present arguments on several complex legal issues. Given the lack of judicial precedent in this area, as well as the size and profile of the Telegram project, the Telegram case was closely watched by blockchain industry participants and represents a significant development for this emerging market. Here we provide an overview of the case, an analysis of the Court’s ruling, details on the final resolutions, and some key takeaways.","PeriodicalId":399186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investment Compliance","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investment Compliance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joic-10-2020-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 The Telegram case is arguably the most important case of 2020 involving the legal classification of blockchain-based digital assets. Because it is often cost-prohibitive for companies to challenge the government in court, the Telegram litigation offered a unique opportunity for the parties to present arguments on several complex legal issues. Given the lack of judicial precedent in this area, as well as the size and profile of the Telegram project, the Telegram case was closely watched by blockchain industry participants and represents a significant development for this emerging market. Here we provide an overview of the case, an analysis of the Court’s ruling, details on the final resolutions, and some key takeaways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电报:解构2020年最大的bbb100案件之一
1 . Telegram一案可以说是2020年最重要的案件,涉及基于区块链的数字资产的法律分类。由于公司在法庭上挑战政府的成本往往过高,因此Telegram的诉讼为双方提供了一个独特的机会,可以就几个复杂的法律问题进行辩论。鉴于这一领域缺乏司法先例,以及Telegram项目的规模和概况,Telegram案受到区块链行业参与者的密切关注,代表了这一新兴市场的重大发展。在这里,我们将概述此案,分析法院的裁决,最后决议的细节,以及一些关键要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ESG litigation – how companies can get ready, respond and resolve claims Strengthening AML/CFT controls of digital payment token service providers in Singapore Understanding regulatory trends: digital assets & anti-Money laundering “Racing” to the IBOR transition finish line Structuring and financing private equity and venture capital transactions in Luxembourg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1