Empirical Research on Accounting Choice

Thomas D. Fields, Thomas Z Lys, Linda Vincent
{"title":"Empirical Research on Accounting Choice","authors":"Thomas D. Fields, Thomas Z Lys, Linda Vincent","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.258519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We review research from the 1990s that examines the determinants and consequences of accounting choice, structuring our analysis around the three types of market imperfections that influence managers? choices: agency costs, information asymmetries, and externalities affecting noncontracting parties. We conclude that research in the 1990s made limited progress in expanding our understanding of accounting choice because of limitations in research design and a focus on replication rather than extension of current knowledge. We discuss opportunities for future research, recommending the exploration of the economic implications of accounting choice by addressing the three different reasons why accounting matters.","PeriodicalId":123337,"journal":{"name":"History of Accounting eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1579","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.258519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1579

Abstract

We review research from the 1990s that examines the determinants and consequences of accounting choice, structuring our analysis around the three types of market imperfections that influence managers? choices: agency costs, information asymmetries, and externalities affecting noncontracting parties. We conclude that research in the 1990s made limited progress in expanding our understanding of accounting choice because of limitations in research design and a focus on replication rather than extension of current knowledge. We discuss opportunities for future research, recommending the exploration of the economic implications of accounting choice by addressing the three different reasons why accounting matters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会计选择的实证研究
我们回顾了20世纪90年代以来的研究,这些研究考察了会计选择的决定因素和后果,围绕影响管理者的三种市场不完善类型构建了我们的分析。选择:代理成本、信息不对称和影响非缔约方的外部性。我们的结论是,20世纪90年代的研究在扩大我们对会计选择的理解方面取得了有限的进展,因为研究设计的局限性和对现有知识的复制而不是扩展的关注。我们讨论了未来研究的机会,建议通过解决会计问题的三个不同原因来探索会计选择的经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of U.S. Regulation and the Standard-Setting Process for Financial Reporting: 1930s to the Present Learning to Disclose: Disclosure Dynamics in the 1890s Streetcar Industry Financial Reporting by Charities: Why Do Some Choose to Report Under a More Extensive Reporting Framework? What Makes Research Possible? The Management Studies Research Division at the London School of Economics How America was Tricked on Tax Policy: Secrets and Undisclosed Practices - Book Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1