INVALIDITY OF TRANSACTIONS IN INHERITANCE LAW

V. A. Goncharova
{"title":"INVALIDITY OF TRANSACTIONS IN INHERITANCE LAW","authors":"V. A. Goncharova","doi":"10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-8-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the features of invalidating bargains in the inheritance law of Russia (will, inheritance contract, acceptance of inheritance and rejection). It is concluded that the features of the hereditary legal relations themselves, as causally caused not by the expression of the will of the subjects of civil law, but by the death (declaration of the dead) of the potential testator, predetermine a special procedure for establishing defects in these bargains and the consequences of their invalidity, which differ from traditional restitution and compensation for losses. The legislative approach, consisting in the possibility of recognizing a will as the main bargain in inheritance law, invalid only after the death of the testator, on the one hand, is justified. At the same time, in practice, it necessitates the conduct of posthumous forensic psychiatric examinations in order to establish the true will of the testator and its compliance with the content of the will, which are very ambiguous in terms of the formulated conclusions. The regulation of an inheritance contract as a basis for inheritance, in turn, provides for an optimal mechanism for invalidating it. Acceptance of inheritance and rejection of it, committed by contacting a notary, can also be qualified as transactions, the consequence of the invalidity of which is a change in the dynamics of hereditary legal relations.","PeriodicalId":226672,"journal":{"name":"Law of succession","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law of succession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-8-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the features of invalidating bargains in the inheritance law of Russia (will, inheritance contract, acceptance of inheritance and rejection). It is concluded that the features of the hereditary legal relations themselves, as causally caused not by the expression of the will of the subjects of civil law, but by the death (declaration of the dead) of the potential testator, predetermine a special procedure for establishing defects in these bargains and the consequences of their invalidity, which differ from traditional restitution and compensation for losses. The legislative approach, consisting in the possibility of recognizing a will as the main bargain in inheritance law, invalid only after the death of the testator, on the one hand, is justified. At the same time, in practice, it necessitates the conduct of posthumous forensic psychiatric examinations in order to establish the true will of the testator and its compliance with the content of the will, which are very ambiguous in terms of the formulated conclusions. The regulation of an inheritance contract as a basis for inheritance, in turn, provides for an optimal mechanism for invalidating it. Acceptance of inheritance and rejection of it, committed by contacting a notary, can also be qualified as transactions, the consequence of the invalidity of which is a change in the dynamics of hereditary legal relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继承法中交易的无效
本文分析了俄罗斯继承法中交易无效的特点(遗嘱、继承合同、接受继承和拒绝继承)。结论是,世袭法律关系本身的特点,不是由民法主体的意志的表达,而是由潜在遗嘱人的死亡(宣告死亡)造成的,预先决定了一种特殊的程序,以确定这些交易的缺陷及其无效的后果,这与传统的赔偿和赔偿损失不同。一方面,承认遗嘱是继承法中的主要交易,只有在遗嘱人死亡后才无效的立法途径是合理的。与此同时,在实践中,必须进行死后法医精神检查,以确定遗嘱人的真实遗嘱及其是否符合遗嘱的内容,而遗嘱的内容在拟定的结论方面非常模糊。作为继承基础的继承契约的规则反过来又提供了使其无效的最佳机制。通过与公证人联系而作出的接受和拒绝继承的行为也可以被定性为交易,其无效的后果是世袭法律关系的动态变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PUBLIC DANGER OF CIVIL OFFENSES IN THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AN HEIR UNWORTHY FICTIONS AND PRESUMPTIONS AS A LEGAL WRITING TECHNIQUE IN INHERITANCE AND THE RESULTING LEGAL PARADOXES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN AND COMMON LAW PROTECTION OF INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF A CHILD BORN WITH THE USE OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ISSUES OF MANAGEMENT OF A WILL IN RESPECT OF THE TESTATOR'S DIGITAL ASSETS CREATION OF A UNIFIED REGISTER OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SOLUTION OF INHERITANCE ISSUES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1