Watchful Eyes: National Security Review and Oversight in Canada

Leah West
{"title":"Watchful Eyes: National Security Review and Oversight in Canada","authors":"Leah West","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3449183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For almost two decades, the reach of Canada’s intelligence and security community continued to expand in this vein without any significant enhancement to the review bodies that serve as a check on its power. Until 2019, only the RCMP, CSIS and CSE were subject to regular national security review, while other organizations like CBSA, DND, and DFAIT underwent sporadic review by commission of inquiries established to investigate catastrophic failures in the system; commissions which consistently identified Canada’s siloed approach to national security review as a priority for reform. This chapter begins by setting out the definition of review and oversight, followed by the history of Canada’s review bodies. It then details the dramatic remodelling of review and oversight in Canada and describes the structure, mandates and resources of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), the National Security Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA), and the office of the Intelligence Commissioner (IC). It is too early to identify the impacts these reforms will have on Canada’s intelligence and security community thus, this Chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the factors that could impact their success.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"48 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For almost two decades, the reach of Canada’s intelligence and security community continued to expand in this vein without any significant enhancement to the review bodies that serve as a check on its power. Until 2019, only the RCMP, CSIS and CSE were subject to regular national security review, while other organizations like CBSA, DND, and DFAIT underwent sporadic review by commission of inquiries established to investigate catastrophic failures in the system; commissions which consistently identified Canada’s siloed approach to national security review as a priority for reform. This chapter begins by setting out the definition of review and oversight, followed by the history of Canada’s review bodies. It then details the dramatic remodelling of review and oversight in Canada and describes the structure, mandates and resources of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), the National Security Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA), and the office of the Intelligence Commissioner (IC). It is too early to identify the impacts these reforms will have on Canada’s intelligence and security community thus, this Chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the factors that could impact their success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警惕的眼睛:加拿大的国家安全审查和监督
在近二十年的时间里,加拿大情报和安全机构的影响范围继续以这种方式扩大,而对其权力进行制衡的审查机构却没有任何重大加强。直到2019年,只有RCMP、CSIS和CSE受到定期的国家安全审查,而其他组织,如CBSA、DND和DFAIT则接受了为调查系统灾难性故障而建立的调查委员会的零星审查;这些委员会一贯将加拿大对国家安全审查的孤立做法确定为改革的优先事项。本章首先阐述审查和监督的定义,然后介绍加拿大审查机构的历史。然后,它详细介绍了加拿大审查和监督的戏剧性重塑,并描述了国会国家安全和情报委员会(NSICOP)、国家安全情报审查机构(NSIRA)和情报专员办公室(IC)的结构、任务和资源。现在确定这些改革对加拿大情报和安全社区的影响还为时过早,因此,本章最后简要讨论了可能影响其成功的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to Canadian Government's Consultation on a Modern Copyright Framework for Online Intermediaries Legal Documents as Means of Financial Abstraction: How the Bankers’ Lawyers Constructed Swaps and Changed Finance Corporate Adolescence: Why Did 'We' not Work? AI Governance in Canadian Banking: Fairness, Credit Models, and Equality Rights Policy Forum: The Case for an Annual Net Wealth Tax
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1