Brief Thoughts on Adoption Scholarship

Heather Jacobson
{"title":"Brief Thoughts on Adoption Scholarship","authors":"Heather Jacobson","doi":"10.1353/ado.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:In this short essay, I contemplate the field of adoption scholarship via two questions posed to me by Emily Hipchen and Marina Fedosik. I first share some brief thoughts on the intersection of adoption scholarship with other areas of inquiry. I posit that adoption could—and should be—better integrated into the larger scholarship on families, including examinations of assisted reproduction. I then share some of the important adoption monographs that have influenced my own research and teaching on families, international adoption, surrogacy, and ART.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:In this short essay, I contemplate the field of adoption scholarship via two questions posed to me by Emily Hipchen and Marina Fedosik. I first share some brief thoughts on the intersection of adoption scholarship with other areas of inquiry. I posit that adoption could—and should be—better integrated into the larger scholarship on families, including examinations of assisted reproduction. I then share some of the important adoption monographs that have influenced my own research and teaching on families, international adoption, surrogacy, and ART.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于收养奖学金的简单思考
在这篇短文中,我通过Emily Hipchen和Marina Fedosik向我提出的两个问题来思考收养学术领域。我首先分享一些关于收养奖学金与其他研究领域交叉的简短想法。我认为,收养可以——也应该——更好地整合到更广泛的家庭奖学金中,包括辅助生殖的检查。然后,我分享了一些重要的收养专著,这些专著影响了我自己在家庭、国际收养、代孕和ART方面的研究和教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1