A Strategy for Verification of Decomposable SCR Models

Dejan Desovski, B. Cukic
{"title":"A Strategy for Verification of Decomposable SCR Models","authors":"Dejan Desovski, B. Cukic","doi":"10.1109/PRDC.2006.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal methods for verification of software systems often face the problem of state explosion and complexity. We propose a divide and conquer methodology which leads to component-based verification and analysis of formal requirements specifications expressed using software cost reduction (SCR) models. This paper presents a novel decomposition methodology which identifies components in the given SCR specification and automates related abstraction methods. Further, we propose a verification strategy for modular and decomposable software models. Efficient verification of SCR models is achieved through the use of invariants and proof compositions. Experimental validation of our methodology brought to light the importance of modularity, encapsulation, information hiding and the avoidance of global variables in the context of formal specification models. The advantages of the compositional verification strategy are demonstrated in the analysis of the personnel access control system. Our approach offers significant savings in terms of time and memory requirements needed to perform formal system verification","PeriodicalId":314915,"journal":{"name":"2006 12th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC'06)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 12th Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing (PRDC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2006.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formal methods for verification of software systems often face the problem of state explosion and complexity. We propose a divide and conquer methodology which leads to component-based verification and analysis of formal requirements specifications expressed using software cost reduction (SCR) models. This paper presents a novel decomposition methodology which identifies components in the given SCR specification and automates related abstraction methods. Further, we propose a verification strategy for modular and decomposable software models. Efficient verification of SCR models is achieved through the use of invariants and proof compositions. Experimental validation of our methodology brought to light the importance of modularity, encapsulation, information hiding and the avoidance of global variables in the context of formal specification models. The advantages of the compositional verification strategy are demonstrated in the analysis of the personnel access control system. Our approach offers significant savings in terms of time and memory requirements needed to perform formal system verification
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可分解SCR模型的验证策略
软件系统验证的形式化方法经常面临状态爆炸和复杂性的问题。我们提出了一种分而治之的方法,它导致了对使用软件成本降低(SCR)模型表达的正式需求规范的基于组件的验证和分析。本文提出了一种新的分解方法,该方法可以识别给定SCR规范中的组件,并实现相关抽象方法的自动化。进一步,我们提出了一种模块化和可分解软件模型的验证策略。有效的验证SCR模型是通过使用不变量和证明组合实现的。我们的方法的实验验证揭示了模块化、封装、信息隐藏和在正式规范模型上下文中避免全局变量的重要性。通过对人员门禁系统的分析,证明了组合验证策略的优越性。我们的方法在执行正式系统验证所需的时间和内存需求方面提供了显著的节省
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Restoration Strategies In Mesh Optical Networks: Cost Vs. Service Availability A New Approach to Improving the Test Effectiveness in Software Testing Using Fault Collapsing Quantum Oblivious Transfer and Fair Digital Transactions Design Trade-Offs and Deadlock Prevention in Transient Fault-Tolerant SMT Processors Evaluating the Impact of Fault Recovery on Superscalar Processor Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1