Knowledge as Explanations

M. Valente
{"title":"Knowledge as Explanations","authors":"M. Valente","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2918920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses the implications of considering any piece of knowledge as composed by a chain of explanations, and, consequently, of assuming as goal of scientific research the production of new knowledge in the form of novel, or better, explanations. \nThis perspective provides a consistent framework to interpret the activities related to knowledge creation and leads to fruitful implications. We can classify rigorously different types of research questions and the components of individual explanations, suggesting rigorous protocols to carry on research projects. The issue of assessing scientific claims can be framed formally facilitating the solution of scientific disputes. Finally, it allows to overcome the distinction between \"hard\" and \"soft\" sciences specifying the features of accessible potential knowledge depending on the nature of the phenomena analyzed. \nThough our proposal is not specific to a particular discipline, we focus on the implications for scholar of Economics. We discuss a few examples of methodological approaches frequently adopted by economists under the light of considering as goal of scientific research the production of convincing explanations rather than accurate descriptions.","PeriodicalId":399171,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science eJournal","volume":"303 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2918920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The paper discusses the implications of considering any piece of knowledge as composed by a chain of explanations, and, consequently, of assuming as goal of scientific research the production of new knowledge in the form of novel, or better, explanations. This perspective provides a consistent framework to interpret the activities related to knowledge creation and leads to fruitful implications. We can classify rigorously different types of research questions and the components of individual explanations, suggesting rigorous protocols to carry on research projects. The issue of assessing scientific claims can be framed formally facilitating the solution of scientific disputes. Finally, it allows to overcome the distinction between "hard" and "soft" sciences specifying the features of accessible potential knowledge depending on the nature of the phenomena analyzed. Though our proposal is not specific to a particular discipline, we focus on the implications for scholar of Economics. We discuss a few examples of methodological approaches frequently adopted by economists under the light of considering as goal of scientific research the production of convincing explanations rather than accurate descriptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识作为解释
本文讨论了将任何知识视为由一系列解释组成的含义,并因此将以新颖或更好的解释形式产生新知识作为科学研究的目标。这种观点提供了一个一致的框架来解释与知识创造相关的活动,并导致富有成效的影响。我们可以对不同类型的研究问题和个别解释的组成部分进行严格的分类,为开展研究项目提供严格的协议。评估科学主张的问题可以正式提出,以促进科学争端的解决。最后,它允许克服“硬”科学和“软”科学之间的区别,根据所分析现象的性质指定可访问的潜在知识的特征。虽然我们的建议并不针对某一学科,但我们的重点是对经济学学者的影响。我们讨论了一些经济学家经常采用的方法论方法的例子,他们认为科学研究的目标是产生令人信服的解释,而不是准确的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Theory of Imagination in Economic Games Menopause as a Regulatory Device for Matching the Demand for Children with Its Supply: A Hypothesis Adjustments and Compromises of Household Economy Approach in Burkina Faso On Joan Robinson’s Completely Successful Indoctrination of John Kenneth Galbraith: Turning a Potential Keynesian Into an Actual Robinsonian Expected Utility in 3D
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1