Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems.

Klodiana Lanaj, Remy E. Jennings
{"title":"Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems.","authors":"Klodiana Lanaj, Remy E. Jennings","doi":"10.1037/apl0000450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although leaders spend considerable time helping followers with personal problems, little research has investigated how such helping acts may impact leaders themselves. Drawing from affective events theory and the helping literature, we examine how responding to followers' help requests with personal problems influences leaders' own affect. As expected, we found that helping followers with personal problems was associated with an increase in leaders' negative affect. The strength of the association between personal helping and negative affect, however, depended on the day and on the leader. Specifically, personal helping increased negative affect less on days when leaders perceived their prosocial impact of personal helping to be high (vs. low). On the other hand, personal helping increased negative affect more on days when leaders also helped with task-related problems. Furthermore, at the between-person level, leaders with high (vs. low) managerial experience were less affected by personal helping. In exploratory analyses, we also investigated how followers reacted to leaders' helping. We found that whereas leader task-related helping was associated with follower perceptions of leader work engagement, leader personal helping was not. Additionally, helping with personal problems detracted from followers' increased perceptions of work engagement derived from leaders' task-related helping. Specifically, followers rated leaders who helped with task-related problems as more engaged on days when these leaders provided less (vs. more) personal helping. We discuss implications for research on helping and leadership. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Although leaders spend considerable time helping followers with personal problems, little research has investigated how such helping acts may impact leaders themselves. Drawing from affective events theory and the helping literature, we examine how responding to followers' help requests with personal problems influences leaders' own affect. As expected, we found that helping followers with personal problems was associated with an increase in leaders' negative affect. The strength of the association between personal helping and negative affect, however, depended on the day and on the leader. Specifically, personal helping increased negative affect less on days when leaders perceived their prosocial impact of personal helping to be high (vs. low). On the other hand, personal helping increased negative affect more on days when leaders also helped with task-related problems. Furthermore, at the between-person level, leaders with high (vs. low) managerial experience were less affected by personal helping. In exploratory analyses, we also investigated how followers reacted to leaders' helping. We found that whereas leader task-related helping was associated with follower perceptions of leader work engagement, leader personal helping was not. Additionally, helping with personal problems detracted from followers' increased perceptions of work engagement derived from leaders' task-related helping. Specifically, followers rated leaders who helped with task-related problems as more engaged on days when these leaders provided less (vs. more) personal helping. We discuss implications for research on helping and leadership. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让领导者心情不好:帮助下属解决个人问题的情感成本。
尽管领导者花费大量时间帮助下属解决个人问题,但很少有研究调查这种帮助行为如何影响领导者自己。根据情感事件理论和助人文献,我们研究了如何回应下属对个人问题的帮助请求影响领导者自己的情感。不出所料,我们发现帮助下属解决个人问题与领导者负面影响的增加有关。然而,个人帮助和消极影响之间的联系强度取决于当天和领导者。具体来说,当领导者认为个人帮助的亲社会影响高时,个人帮助增加的负面影响较少(相对较低)。另一方面,当领导者也帮助解决与任务相关的问题时,个人帮助会增加更多的负面影响。此外,在人际层面上,管理经验丰富的领导者受个人帮助的影响较小。在探索性分析中,我们还调查了追随者对领导者帮助的反应。我们发现,领导任务相关帮助与下属对领导工作投入的感知相关,而领导个人帮助与下属对领导工作投入的感知无关。此外,帮助下属解决个人问题也降低了下属对工作投入的认知,而这种投入来自于领导者与任务相关的帮助。具体来说,在那些帮助解决任务相关问题的领导者提供更少(与更多)个人帮助的日子里,追随者认为他们更投入。我们讨论了帮助与领导力研究的意义。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The benefits of reflecting on gratitude received at home for leaders at work: Insights from three field experiments. Personality and leadership: Meta-analytic review of cross-cultural moderation, behavioral mediation, and honesty-humility. Newcomers building social capital by proactive networking: A signaling perspective. Supportive, resistant, or both? A person-centric view on employee responses to diversity initiatives. A regulatory focus theory perspective on the dynamics between action and power.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1