S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink
{"title":"Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia","authors":"S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink","doi":"10.3233/IP-170069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using \nqualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses \nthe motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic \nequivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a \nhigher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience \nfactors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the \nwell-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic \ngovernment services follow.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using
qualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses
the motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic
equivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a
higher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience
factors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the
well-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic
government services follow.