Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia

Inf. Polity Pub Date : 2018-12-10 DOI:10.3233/IP-170069
S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink
{"title":"Explaining non-adoption of electronic government services by citizens: A study among non-users of public e-services in Latvia","authors":"S. Walle, Zane Zeibote, Sergejs Stacenko, T. Muravska, K. Migchelbrink","doi":"10.3233/IP-170069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using \nqualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses \nthe motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic \nequivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a \nhigher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience \nfactors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the \nwell-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic \ngovernment services follow.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper analyses citizen motives for not using electronic government services. Using qualitative interviews among users of Citizens´ Service Centers in Latvia, this paper analyses the motives of citizens not to use electronic government services but to rely on non-electronic equivalents or on in-person assistance. It expands the literature on e-commerce and egovernment through an explicit focus on non-adoption rather than adoption. Findings show a higher than expected importance of hardware and internet availability, as well convenience factors as important reasons for non-adoption. The research furthermore reveals that the well-intentioned supply of non-electronic alternatives may hamper the take-up of egovernment. A number of recommendations for the further development of electronic government services follow.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解释公民不采用电子政府服务:拉脱维亚非公共电子服务用户的研究
本文分析了公民不使用电子政务服务的动机。通过对拉脱维亚公民服务中心用户的定性访谈,本文分析了公民不使用电子政府服务,而是依赖非电子等同物或亲自协助的动机。它通过明确地关注非采用而不是采用,扩展了电子商务和电子政务的文献。调查结果显示,硬件和互联网可用性的重要性高于预期,便利性因素是不采用的重要原因。研究进一步表明,非电子替代品的善意供应可能会阻碍电子政务的普及。以下是进一步发展电子政府服务的若干建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Policy Review: The Evolving Governance of Surveillance Cameras in the UK Editorial: Improving Diversity in our Journal Two Editorials: An Editorial by the Editors-in-Chief and an Editorial by ChatGPT The Dutch Open Government Act: Bridging old and new open government? The Power of Partnership in Open Government: Reconsidering Multistakeholder Governance Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1