Toward a Systematic and Safety Evidence Productive Verification Approach for Safety-Critical Systems

Aiman Gannous, A. Andrews, B. Gallina
{"title":"Toward a Systematic and Safety Evidence Productive Verification Approach for Safety-Critical Systems","authors":"Aiman Gannous, A. Andrews, B. Gallina","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In safety-critical systems, the verification and validation phase in the software development life cycle plays an important role in assuring safety. The artifacts' outputs of the verification and validation processes represent the evidence needed to show a satisfactory fulfillment of the safety requirements. Providing strong evidence to show that the requirements of the domain standards are met is the core of demonstrating safety standards compliance. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for verifying safety-critical systems efficiently by integrating model-based testing, combinatorial testing, and safety analysis; this is all driven by providing safety assurance. The approach provides both testing and formal verification capabilities, and it is easy to implement into a tool for use in an industry setting. To show how our approach could contribute to safety standards compliance, we investigated it's capability to fulfill the safety requirements by analyzing and linking the data produced from the steps in the approach to a safety evidence taxonomy.","PeriodicalId":321448,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2018.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In safety-critical systems, the verification and validation phase in the software development life cycle plays an important role in assuring safety. The artifacts' outputs of the verification and validation processes represent the evidence needed to show a satisfactory fulfillment of the safety requirements. Providing strong evidence to show that the requirements of the domain standards are met is the core of demonstrating safety standards compliance. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for verifying safety-critical systems efficiently by integrating model-based testing, combinatorial testing, and safety analysis; this is all driven by providing safety assurance. The approach provides both testing and formal verification capabilities, and it is easy to implement into a tool for use in an industry setting. To show how our approach could contribute to safety standards compliance, we investigated it's capability to fulfill the safety requirements by analyzing and linking the data produced from the steps in the approach to a safety evidence taxonomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向安全关键系统的系统和安全证据生产验证方法
在安全关键型系统中,软件开发生命周期中的验证和确认阶段在确保安全方面起着重要作用。工件的验证和确认过程的输出代表了显示安全需求得到满意满足所需的证据。提供强有力的证据来证明满足领域标准的要求是证明安全标准遵从性的核心。在本文中,我们提出了一种系统的方法,通过集成基于模型的测试,组合测试和安全分析来有效地验证安全关键系统;这一切都是为了提供安全保障。该方法提供了测试和正式的验证功能,并且很容易实现为在工业环境中使用的工具。为了展示我们的方法如何有助于遵守安全标准,我们通过分析方法中的步骤产生的数据并将其链接到安全证据分类法,调查了它满足安全要求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the WoSoCer 2018 Workshop Chairs Software Aging and Rejuvenation in the Cloud: A Literature Review Spectrum-Based Fault Localization for Logic-Based Reasoning [Title page iii] Software Reliability Assessment: Modeling and Algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1