Using the Number of Pores on Fingerprint Images to Detect Spoofing Attacks

M. Espinoza, C. Champod
{"title":"Using the Number of Pores on Fingerprint Images to Detect Spoofing Attacks","authors":"M. Espinoza, C. Champod","doi":"10.1109/ICHB.2011.6094347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the growing use of biometric technologies in our modern society, spoofing attacks are becoming a serious concern. Many solutions have been proposed to detect the use of fake \"fingerprints\" on an acquisition device. In this paper, we propose to take advantage of intrinsic features of friction ridge skin: pores. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of using pores to detect spoofing attacks. Results show that the use of pores is a promising approach. Four major observations were made: First, results confirmed that the reproduction of pores on fake \"fingerprints\" is possible. Second, the distribution of the total number of pores between fake and genuine fingerprints cannot be discriminated. Third, the difference in pore quantities between a query image and a reference image (genuine or fake) can be used as a discriminating factor in a linear discriminant analysis. In our sample, the observed error rates were as follows: 45.5% of false positive (the fake passed the test) and 3.8% of false negative (a genuine print has been rejected). Finally, the performance is improved by using the difference of pore quantity obtained between a distorted query fingerprint and a non-distorted reference fingerprint. By using this approach, the error rates improved to 21.2% of false acceptation rate and 8.3% of false rejection rate.","PeriodicalId":378764,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Hand-Based Biometrics","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Hand-Based Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHB.2011.6094347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Due to the growing use of biometric technologies in our modern society, spoofing attacks are becoming a serious concern. Many solutions have been proposed to detect the use of fake "fingerprints" on an acquisition device. In this paper, we propose to take advantage of intrinsic features of friction ridge skin: pores. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential of using pores to detect spoofing attacks. Results show that the use of pores is a promising approach. Four major observations were made: First, results confirmed that the reproduction of pores on fake "fingerprints" is possible. Second, the distribution of the total number of pores between fake and genuine fingerprints cannot be discriminated. Third, the difference in pore quantities between a query image and a reference image (genuine or fake) can be used as a discriminating factor in a linear discriminant analysis. In our sample, the observed error rates were as follows: 45.5% of false positive (the fake passed the test) and 3.8% of false negative (a genuine print has been rejected). Finally, the performance is improved by using the difference of pore quantity obtained between a distorted query fingerprint and a non-distorted reference fingerprint. By using this approach, the error rates improved to 21.2% of false acceptation rate and 8.3% of false rejection rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用指纹图像的孔隙数检测欺骗攻击
由于现代社会越来越多地使用生物识别技术,欺骗攻击正在成为一个严重的问题。已经提出了许多解决方案来检测采集设备上使用的假“指纹”。在本文中,我们建议利用摩擦脊皮肤的固有特征:毛孔。本研究的目的是研究使用孔隙检测欺骗攻击的潜力。结果表明,利用孔隙是一种很有前途的方法。主要有四项观察结果:第一,结果证实了在假“指纹”上复制毛孔是可能的。其次,不能区分真假指纹之间毛孔总数的分布。第三,查询图像和参考图像(真假)之间孔隙量的差异可以用作线性判别分析中的判别因素。在我们的样本中,观察到的错误率如下:45.5%的假阳性(赝品通过了测试)和3.8%的假阴性(真品被拒绝)。最后,利用扭曲的查询指纹和未扭曲的参考指纹之间孔隙数量的差异来提高性能。采用该方法,误差率提高到21.2%的误接受率和8.3%的误拒率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Palmprint Verification on Mobile Phones Using Accelerated Competitive Code Biometric Identification Based on Hand-Shape Features Using a HMM Kernel Palmprint Identification Using Kronecker Product of DCT and Walsh Transforms for Multi-Spectral Images Orthogonal Complex Locality Preserving Projections Based on Image Space Metric for Finger-Knuckle-Print Recognition Evaluation of Cancelable Biometric Systems: Application to Finger-Knuckle-Prints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1