Exploring New Ground for Religion in the Classroom

Kristi Upson-Saia
{"title":"Exploring New Ground for Religion in the Classroom","authors":"Kristi Upson-Saia","doi":"10.1353/TNF.2014.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their December 31st 1999 issue—the final issue of the millennium— The Economist wrote an obituary for God, boldly pronouncing him dead. After recounting the wide impact of religion in preceding centuries and acknowledging that, even in a post-enlightenment world, “the corpse just wouldn’t lie down,” the editors concluded that the time had finally come to bury the dead. Religion, they declared, had become largely insignificant (“Obituary”).1 As it turned out, the death knell was premature.2 Just a few years later, with the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and with wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the conflation of national identity (or national allegiance) and Christianity emerged with renewed zeal.3 For many Americans—including Muslim-Americans—these events intensified their previously held commitments and the degree to which their religion informed their worldview and sense of self. At times, intensified religious identifications have led to division and tension between religious groups in this country, sometimes erupting in violence. But, at the same time, these events have prompted in many Americans a desire to learn more about religious traditions other than their own and the media, scholars, and Islamic organizations have responded to meet this demand. Oprah, for instance, devoted a full episode to “Islam 101” and Larry King invited a series of Muslim guests to his show. News outlets humanized Islam by running features on Muslim Americans, from Girl Scouts to comedians (Helms; Lee). Scholars published popular books that analyzed the new religious landscape in America and that illuminated the perspectives of Muslims abroad (e.g., Lincoln; Lawrence and Howarth).4 Finally, mosques and Islamic organizations across the country hosted educational events as well as interreligious dialogue. So while fear and distrust have created fissures between some religious communities, a newly educated public has also begun to forge new interreligious understanding and relationships, revealing another feature of American nationalism: religious tolerance and freedom (Eck). In addition to playing a role in national identity and foreign policy, religion is also an increasingly significant indicator of political affiliation. (See, for instance, a recent Pew Center report on the coincidence of religious right membership and support of the Tea Party [Pew Research Center, “The Tea Party”].) Religious logic and rhetoric is also a persistent feature in domestic policy debates, most notably around gay marriage, abortion, and stem cells (Pew Research Center, “Religion”).5 So,","PeriodicalId":138207,"journal":{"name":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TNF.2014.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their December 31st 1999 issue—the final issue of the millennium— The Economist wrote an obituary for God, boldly pronouncing him dead. After recounting the wide impact of religion in preceding centuries and acknowledging that, even in a post-enlightenment world, “the corpse just wouldn’t lie down,” the editors concluded that the time had finally come to bury the dead. Religion, they declared, had become largely insignificant (“Obituary”).1 As it turned out, the death knell was premature.2 Just a few years later, with the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and with wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the conflation of national identity (or national allegiance) and Christianity emerged with renewed zeal.3 For many Americans—including Muslim-Americans—these events intensified their previously held commitments and the degree to which their religion informed their worldview and sense of self. At times, intensified religious identifications have led to division and tension between religious groups in this country, sometimes erupting in violence. But, at the same time, these events have prompted in many Americans a desire to learn more about religious traditions other than their own and the media, scholars, and Islamic organizations have responded to meet this demand. Oprah, for instance, devoted a full episode to “Islam 101” and Larry King invited a series of Muslim guests to his show. News outlets humanized Islam by running features on Muslim Americans, from Girl Scouts to comedians (Helms; Lee). Scholars published popular books that analyzed the new religious landscape in America and that illuminated the perspectives of Muslims abroad (e.g., Lincoln; Lawrence and Howarth).4 Finally, mosques and Islamic organizations across the country hosted educational events as well as interreligious dialogue. So while fear and distrust have created fissures between some religious communities, a newly educated public has also begun to forge new interreligious understanding and relationships, revealing another feature of American nationalism: religious tolerance and freedom (Eck). In addition to playing a role in national identity and foreign policy, religion is also an increasingly significant indicator of political affiliation. (See, for instance, a recent Pew Center report on the coincidence of religious right membership and support of the Tea Party [Pew Research Center, “The Tea Party”].) Religious logic and rhetoric is also a persistent feature in domestic policy debates, most notably around gay marriage, abortion, and stem cells (Pew Research Center, “Religion”).5 So,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在课堂上探索宗教的新领域
1999年12月31日,也就是千禧年的最后一期,《经济学人》为上帝写了一篇讣告,大胆地宣布上帝已死。在叙述了前几个世纪宗教的广泛影响,并承认即使在后启蒙时代,“尸体也不会躺下”之后,编辑们得出结论,埋葬死者的时刻终于到来了。他们宣称,宗教在很大程度上已变得无足轻重(“讣告”)事实证明,敲响丧钟为时过早仅仅几年后,随着9月11日对世贸中心和五角大楼的袭击,以及阿富汗和伊拉克的战争,国家认同(或国家忠诚)与基督教的融合以新的热情出现对许多美国人——包括穆斯林美国人——来说,这些事件强化了他们先前的承诺,以及他们的宗教在多大程度上影响了他们的世界观和自我意识。有时,强烈的宗教认同导致这个国家宗教团体之间的分裂和紧张,有时爆发暴力。但与此同时,这些事件促使许多美国人渴望更多地了解他们自己以外的宗教传统,媒体、学者和伊斯兰组织也对这一需求作出了回应。比如,奥普拉用了整整一集来讲述“伊斯兰教101”,拉里·金邀请了一系列穆斯林嘉宾参加他的节目。新闻媒体通过刊登关于美国穆斯林的特写来使伊斯兰教人性化,从女童子军到喜剧演员(赫尔姆斯;李)。学者们出版了通俗书籍,分析了美国的新宗教景观,并阐明了海外穆斯林的观点(例如,林肯;劳伦斯和豪沃思)最后,全国各地的清真寺和伊斯兰组织举办了教育活动和宗教间对话。因此,虽然恐惧和不信任在一些宗教团体之间造成了裂痕,但受过新教育的公众也开始建立新的宗教间理解和关系,揭示了美国民族主义的另一个特征:宗教宽容和自由。除了在国家认同和外交政策中发挥作用外,宗教也是政治派别的一个日益重要的指标。(例如,皮尤研究中心最近的一份关于宗教右翼成员和茶党的支持的巧合的报告[皮尤研究中心,“茶党”]。)宗教逻辑和修辞在国内政策辩论中也是一个持久的特征,最明显的是围绕同性恋婚姻,堕胎和干细胞(皮尤研究中心,“宗教”)所以,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letting Go of the Lesson Plan: Spontaneity and Flexibility in a Learner-Centered Approach to Maximize Learning in a Graduate School Setting Missed Opportunities: Reflections and Regrets of a Brand-New Professor Beyond Walls: Reconfiguring the Classroom for Active Learning Disrupt and Dismantle: Transforming Higher Education through Culturally Responsive Education Creating Virtual Exchanges: Promoting Intercultural Knowledge When Study Abroad Is Not Possible
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1