Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: a comparative study

Ranga Raju Vatsavai, E. Bright, V. Chandola, B. Bhaduri, A. Cheriyadat, J. Graesser
{"title":"Machine learning approaches for high-resolution urban land cover classification: a comparative study","authors":"Ranga Raju Vatsavai, E. Bright, V. Chandola, B. Bhaduri, A. Cheriyadat, J. Graesser","doi":"10.1145/1999320.1999331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.","PeriodicalId":400763,"journal":{"name":"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1999320.1999331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

The proliferation of several machine learning approaches makes it difficult to identify a suitable classification technique for analyzing high-resolution remote sensing images. In this study, ten classification techniques were compared from five broad machine learning categories. Surprisingly, the performance of simple statistical classification schemes like maximum likelihood and Logistic regression over complex and recent techniques is very close. Given that these two classifiers require little input from the user, they should still be considered for most classification tasks. Multiple classifier systems is a good choice if the resources permit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高分辨率城市土地覆盖分类的机器学习方法:比较研究
几种机器学习方法的激增使得很难确定一种适合分析高分辨率遥感图像的分类技术。在这项研究中,从五大机器学习类别中比较了十种分类技术。令人惊讶的是,简单的统计分类方案,如最大似然和逻辑回归,与复杂和最新的技术相比,性能非常接近。鉴于这两种分类器对用户输入的要求很少,大多数分类任务仍应考虑使用它们。如果资源允许,多分类器系统是一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Online Sharing of Geospatial Big Data Using NoSQL XML Databases Science in times of crisis: delivering situational awareness to emergency managers and the public when disaster strikes MIMIC: Mobile mapping point density calculator Airborne geo-location for search and rescue applications Performance comparisons of spatial data processing techniques for a large scale mobile phone dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1