The Contemporary Legal Basis of International Humanitarian Law and Its Fundamental Principles

E. Crawford, Alison Pert
{"title":"The Contemporary Legal Basis of International Humanitarian Law and Its Fundamental Principles","authors":"E. Crawford, Alison Pert","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316337028.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Introduction As noted in Chapter 1, international humanitarian law (IHL) or the jus in bello (law in war) is one of the oldest bodies of international law and aims to regulate the conduct of States and individual participants in an armed conflict, and to protect people and property. The law seeks to balance twin objectives: the needs of the armed forces of a State (or non-State group) to prosecute the armed conflict, and the humanitarian need to protect those who do not, or no longer, take direct part in the hostilities (known as hors de combat or “out of combat”). Initially, the law only regulated the conduct of States in international armed conflicts; now, the law governs the conduct of States and non-State actors, in international and non-international armed conflicts, and contains a plethora of rules, drawn from treaties, customary international law and other sources, covering weapons, methods of warfare, targeting and the treatment of persons hors de combat . All of these rules find their origins in more general overarching principles of IHL; it is these general principles and specific sources that are explored in this chapter. 2. The law of armed conflict: purpose, concepts, scope, application As stated above, IHL seeks to regulate conduct in armed conflicts. At first glance, such an aim would seem nonsensical – how can one regulate warfare? How can you prohibit certain kinds of killing, wounding and property destruction, while permitting other kinds of violence? Indeed, this very sentiment was expressed by Admiral Lord Fisher, First Sea Lord of the Royal Navy: “the humanizing of War! You might as well talk of the humanizing of Hell … As if war could be civilized! If I'm in command when war breaks out I shall issue my order – ‘The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility. Hit first, hit hard, and hit everywhere.’” However, contrary to Fisher's bleak outlook, history has shown that over the centuries many societies, from many different parts of the globe, have attempted to place limitations on conduct in armed conflict.","PeriodicalId":231099,"journal":{"name":"International Humanitarian Law","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Humanitarian Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316337028.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. Introduction As noted in Chapter 1, international humanitarian law (IHL) or the jus in bello (law in war) is one of the oldest bodies of international law and aims to regulate the conduct of States and individual participants in an armed conflict, and to protect people and property. The law seeks to balance twin objectives: the needs of the armed forces of a State (or non-State group) to prosecute the armed conflict, and the humanitarian need to protect those who do not, or no longer, take direct part in the hostilities (known as hors de combat or “out of combat”). Initially, the law only regulated the conduct of States in international armed conflicts; now, the law governs the conduct of States and non-State actors, in international and non-international armed conflicts, and contains a plethora of rules, drawn from treaties, customary international law and other sources, covering weapons, methods of warfare, targeting and the treatment of persons hors de combat . All of these rules find their origins in more general overarching principles of IHL; it is these general principles and specific sources that are explored in this chapter. 2. The law of armed conflict: purpose, concepts, scope, application As stated above, IHL seeks to regulate conduct in armed conflicts. At first glance, such an aim would seem nonsensical – how can one regulate warfare? How can you prohibit certain kinds of killing, wounding and property destruction, while permitting other kinds of violence? Indeed, this very sentiment was expressed by Admiral Lord Fisher, First Sea Lord of the Royal Navy: “the humanizing of War! You might as well talk of the humanizing of Hell … As if war could be civilized! If I'm in command when war breaks out I shall issue my order – ‘The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility. Hit first, hit hard, and hit everywhere.’” However, contrary to Fisher's bleak outlook, history has shown that over the centuries many societies, from many different parts of the globe, have attempted to place limitations on conduct in armed conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际人道主义法的当代法律基础及其基本原则
1. 如第一章所述,国际人道主义法或战时法是最古老的国际法机构之一,旨在规范武装冲突中国家和个人参与者的行为,并保护人民和财产。该法寻求平衡两个目标:一个是国家(或非国家团体)武装部队对武装冲突进行起诉的需要,另一个是保护那些没有或不再直接参与敌对行动的人(即所谓的“战斗结束”)的人道主义需要。最初,该法只规定各国在国际武装冲突中的行为;现在,该法管辖着国家和非国家行为体在国际性和非国际性武装冲突中的行为,并载有从条约、习惯国际法和其他来源汲取的大量规则,涉及武器、作战方法、目标和非战斗人员的待遇。所有这些规则都源于国际人道法中更为普遍的总体原则;本章探讨的就是这些一般原则和具体来源。2. 武装冲突法:目的、概念、范围和适用如上所述,国际人道法旨在规范武装冲突中的行为。乍一看,这样的目标似乎是荒谬的——一个人怎么能规范战争呢?你如何能禁止某些类型的杀戮、伤害和财产破坏,而允许其他类型的暴力?事实上,这正是皇家海军第一海务大臣、海军上将费希尔勋爵所表达的观点:“战争的人性化!你还不如谈论地狱的人性化……好像战争可以文明化似的!如果战争爆发时由我指挥,我将下达命令——战争的本质是暴力。战争中的节制是愚蠢的。先下手为强,再下手为强。’”然而,与费舍尔的悲观看法相反,历史表明,几个世纪以来,来自全球许多不同地区的许多社会都试图对武装冲突中的行为加以限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Means and Methods of Warfare Individual Status in Armed Conflict: Combatants, Non-combatants, Direct Participation in Hostilities, Prisoners of War and Detention in Non-international Armed Conflict Protection of the Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Historical Development of International Humanitarian Law Types of Armed Conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1