What makes 2D-to-3D stereo conversion perceptually plausible?

Abstract

Different from classic reconstruction of physical depth in computer vision, depth for 2D-to-3D stereo conversion is assigned by humans using semi-automatic painting interfaces and, consequently, is often dramatically wrong. Here we seek to better understand why it still does not fail to convey a sensation of depth. To this end, four typical disparity distortions resulting from manual 2D-to-3D stereo conversion are analyzed: i) smooth remapping, ii) spatial smoothness, iii) motion-compensated, temporal smoothness, and iv) completeness. A perceptual experiment is conducted to quantify the impact of each distortion on the plausibility of the 3D impression relative to a reference without distortion. Close-to-natural videos with known depth were distorted in one of the four above-mentioned aspects and subjects had to indicate if the distortion still allows for a plausible 3D effect. The smallest amounts of distortion that result in a significant rejection suggests a conservative upper bound on the quality requirement of 2D-to-3D conversion.