Preoperative Cannabis Use Did Not Increase Opioid Utilization After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Propensity Score–Matched Model

Simar Puri, Christian B. Ong, Yu-fen Chiu, Juliana Lebowitz, A. Sideris, A. Gonzalez Della Valle, B. Chalmers
{"title":"Preoperative Cannabis Use Did Not Increase Opioid Utilization After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Propensity Score–Matched Model","authors":"Simar Puri, Christian B. Ong, Yu-fen Chiu, Juliana Lebowitz, A. Sideris, A. Gonzalez Della Valle, B. Chalmers","doi":"10.1177/15563316221151158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recreational and medicinal cannabis use is becoming increasingly popular, but there are little data on its effect on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Purpose: We sought to evaluate the relationship between self-reported preoperative cannabis use and postoperative opioid consumption and post-discharge opioid prescriptions following elective primary TKA. Methods: We identified all patients who underwent unilateral, primary TKA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis at a single institution between February 1, 2019, and April 30, 2021, and subdivided them into current cannabis users and non-users based on self-reported data. Regular users were propensity score-matched 1:6 with non-users using logistic regression on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of chronic pain, smoking status, history of anxiety/depression, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and type of anesthesia. Outcomes of interest included median inpatient (total, daily, and hourly) morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), discharge MMEs, and outpatient MMEs within 90 days after surgery. Results: A cohort of 70 current cannabis users was matched with 420 non-users. There were no significant differences in opioid use in inpatient MMEs (hourly, daily, or total), discharge MMEs, or outpatient MMEs between cohorts. Also, there was no significant difference in hospital stay between cohorts. Conclusion: In this retrospective propensity score–matched model, preoperative cannabis use did not independently increase opioid use post-TKA in the inpatient or outpatient setting when compared with non-use. More rigorous, prospective study is warranted.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316221151158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Recreational and medicinal cannabis use is becoming increasingly popular, but there are little data on its effect on postoperative pain and opioid consumption after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Purpose: We sought to evaluate the relationship between self-reported preoperative cannabis use and postoperative opioid consumption and post-discharge opioid prescriptions following elective primary TKA. Methods: We identified all patients who underwent unilateral, primary TKA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis at a single institution between February 1, 2019, and April 30, 2021, and subdivided them into current cannabis users and non-users based on self-reported data. Regular users were propensity score-matched 1:6 with non-users using logistic regression on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), history of chronic pain, smoking status, history of anxiety/depression, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, and type of anesthesia. Outcomes of interest included median inpatient (total, daily, and hourly) morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), discharge MMEs, and outpatient MMEs within 90 days after surgery. Results: A cohort of 70 current cannabis users was matched with 420 non-users. There were no significant differences in opioid use in inpatient MMEs (hourly, daily, or total), discharge MMEs, or outpatient MMEs between cohorts. Also, there was no significant difference in hospital stay between cohorts. Conclusion: In this retrospective propensity score–matched model, preoperative cannabis use did not independently increase opioid use post-TKA in the inpatient or outpatient setting when compared with non-use. More rigorous, prospective study is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在倾向评分匹配模型中,术前使用大麻不会增加初次全膝关节置换术后阿片类药物的使用
背景:娱乐性和药用大麻的使用正变得越来越流行,但关于其对原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的影响的数据很少。目的:我们试图评估自我报告的术前大麻使用与术后阿片类药物消耗和选择性原发性TKA后出院后阿片类药物处方之间的关系。方法:我们确定了2019年2月1日至2021年4月30日期间在单一机构接受单侧原发性TKA诊断为骨关节炎的所有患者,并根据自我报告的数据将其细分为当前大麻使用者和非大麻使用者。使用logistic回归对年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、慢性疼痛史、吸烟状况、焦虑/抑郁史、美国麻醉学会(ASA)分类和麻醉类型等因素进行logistic回归,常规服用者与非服用者的倾向评分匹配为1:6。研究结果包括术后90天内住院(总、每日和每小时)吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)、出院时MMEs和门诊时MMEs的中位数。结果:70名目前的大麻使用者与420名非使用者相匹配。在住院MMEs(每小时、每天或总)、出院MMEs或门诊MMEs中,阿片类药物的使用在队列之间没有显著差异。此外,两组患者的住院时间也没有显著差异。结论:在这个回顾性倾向评分匹配模型中,与未使用相比,术前使用大麻不会独立增加住院或门诊tka后阿片类药物的使用。更严格的前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial Interventions to Reduce Post operative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review The Efficacy of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Should Surgeons Be Wearing Ear Protection During Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty? Symptomatic Early Rupture of the InSpace Subacromial Balloon Spacer: A Case Report A Nationwide Comparison of Outcomes and Resource Use in Staged vs Simultaneous Cervical and Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Database Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1