Differential Inference Testing: A Practical Approach to Evaluate Sanitizations of Datasets

Ali Kassem, G. Ács, C. Castelluccia, C. Palamidessi
{"title":"Differential Inference Testing: A Practical Approach to Evaluate Sanitizations of Datasets","authors":"Ali Kassem, G. Ács, C. Castelluccia, C. Palamidessi","doi":"10.1109/SPW.2019.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to protect individuals' privacy, data have to be \"well-sanitized\" before sharing them, i.e. one has to remove any personal information before sharing data. However, it is not always clear when data shall be deemed well-sanitized. In this paper, we argue that the evaluation of sanitized data should be based on whether the data allows the inference of sensitive information that is specific to an individual, instead of being centered around the concept of re-identification. We propose a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of different sanitization techniques on a given dataset by measuring how much an individual's record from the sanitized dataset influences the inference of his/her own sensitive attribute. Our intent is not to accurately predict any sensitive attribute but rather to measure the impact of a single record on the inference of sensitive information. We demonstrate our approach by sanitizing two real datasets in different privacy models and evaluate/compare each sanitized dataset in our framework.","PeriodicalId":125351,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPW.2019.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In order to protect individuals' privacy, data have to be "well-sanitized" before sharing them, i.e. one has to remove any personal information before sharing data. However, it is not always clear when data shall be deemed well-sanitized. In this paper, we argue that the evaluation of sanitized data should be based on whether the data allows the inference of sensitive information that is specific to an individual, instead of being centered around the concept of re-identification. We propose a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of different sanitization techniques on a given dataset by measuring how much an individual's record from the sanitized dataset influences the inference of his/her own sensitive attribute. Our intent is not to accurately predict any sensitive attribute but rather to measure the impact of a single record on the inference of sensitive information. We demonstrate our approach by sanitizing two real datasets in different privacy models and evaluate/compare each sanitized dataset in our framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差分推理测试:一种评估数据集净化的实用方法
为了保护个人隐私,在共享数据之前,必须对数据进行“充分消毒”,即在共享数据之前,必须删除任何个人信息。然而,在什么时候数据被认为是经过良好处理的并不总是很清楚。在本文中,我们认为对净化数据的评估应该基于数据是否允许对特定于个人的敏感信息进行推断,而不是围绕重新识别的概念。我们提出了一个框架来评估不同的消毒技术在给定数据集上的有效性,通过测量消毒数据集中的个人记录对他/她自己的敏感属性推断的影响程度。我们的目的不是准确地预测任何敏感属性,而是度量单个记录对敏感信息推断的影响。我们通过在不同的隐私模型中对两个真实数据集进行消毒,并在我们的框架中评估/比较每个消毒过的数据集,来演示我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the Safe and Secure Operation of Electronic Control Units in Road Vehicles MaxNet: Neural Network Architecture for Continuous Detection of Malicious Activity Feasibility of a Keystroke Timing Attack on Search Engines with Autocomplete Characterizing Vulnerability of DNS AXFR Transfers with Global-Scale Scanning IOTFLA : A Secured and Privacy-Preserving Smart Home Architecture Implementing Federated Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1