Efficacy of different management practices against tomato fruit borer, helicoverpa armigera hubner

M. Kamal, S. Das, Mh Sabit, D. Das
{"title":"Efficacy of different management practices against tomato fruit borer, helicoverpa armigera hubner","authors":"M. Kamal, S. Das, Mh Sabit, D. Das","doi":"10.3329/BJAR.V44I2.41823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different management practices to control tomato fruit borer (TFB) under field condition. The field experiment was carried out with eight treatments, namely Neem oil, Mahogany oil, Fish and Fermented Gur (brown sugar), Netting, Chlorpyriphos, Emamectin Benzoate and Cartap along with untreated control in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and each treatment was replicated thrice. The study was under taken during the period from 25 October, 2017 to 06 April 2018. Data were collected on number and weight of total fruits plot-1, number and weight of total healthy fruits plot-1, number and weight of total infested fruits plot-1, fruits infestation (%) in number and weight, infestation reduction over control for number and weight, number of holes, and larvae plot-1, total yield plot-1 and marketable yield plot-1. Among the different management practices, netting provided the highest infestation reduction over control. The percent fruit infestation reduction over control (number basis) was the highest in Netting treated plot resulting 61.87%, 73.27%, 84.68% and 92.70% at four different harvests, respectively. The percent fruit infestation reduction over control (weight basis) was the highest with the same treatment resulting 61.38%, 74.26%, 88.41% and 91.71% at four different harvests, respectively. The number of holes plot-1 was also the lowest in Netting treated plot resulting 5.00, 8.00, 15.33 and 8.67 at four different harvests, respectively. The number of larvae plot-1 was the lowest with the same treatment resulting 2.00, 2.33, 3.67 and 3.00 at four different harvests, respectively. The maximum marketable yield (33.95 t ha-1) was achieved in the Emamectin Benzoate treated plot with the highest (1.46) benefit cost ratio. \nBangladesh J. Agril. Res. 44(2): 339-353, June 2019","PeriodicalId":103111,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJAR.V44I2.41823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different management practices to control tomato fruit borer (TFB) under field condition. The field experiment was carried out with eight treatments, namely Neem oil, Mahogany oil, Fish and Fermented Gur (brown sugar), Netting, Chlorpyriphos, Emamectin Benzoate and Cartap along with untreated control in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and each treatment was replicated thrice. The study was under taken during the period from 25 October, 2017 to 06 April 2018. Data were collected on number and weight of total fruits plot-1, number and weight of total healthy fruits plot-1, number and weight of total infested fruits plot-1, fruits infestation (%) in number and weight, infestation reduction over control for number and weight, number of holes, and larvae plot-1, total yield plot-1 and marketable yield plot-1. Among the different management practices, netting provided the highest infestation reduction over control. The percent fruit infestation reduction over control (number basis) was the highest in Netting treated plot resulting 61.87%, 73.27%, 84.68% and 92.70% at four different harvests, respectively. The percent fruit infestation reduction over control (weight basis) was the highest with the same treatment resulting 61.38%, 74.26%, 88.41% and 91.71% at four different harvests, respectively. The number of holes plot-1 was also the lowest in Netting treated plot resulting 5.00, 8.00, 15.33 and 8.67 at four different harvests, respectively. The number of larvae plot-1 was the lowest with the same treatment resulting 2.00, 2.33, 3.67 and 3.00 at four different harvests, respectively. The maximum marketable yield (33.95 t ha-1) was achieved in the Emamectin Benzoate treated plot with the highest (1.46) benefit cost ratio. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 44(2): 339-353, June 2019
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同管理措施防治番茄果螟、棉铃虫的效果
在田间条件下,评价不同管理措施防治番茄果螟的效果。田间试验采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD),采用印楝油、红木油、鱼和发酵Gur(红糖)、nettting、Chlorpyriphos、Emamectin Benzoate和Cartap 8个处理和未处理对照,每个处理重复3次。该研究于2017年10月25日至2018年4月6日期间进行。数据收集总水果第一块的数量和重量,总健康水果第一块的数量和重量,数量和重量的总出没的第一块水果,水果侵扰(%)在数量和重量,减少虫害控制的数量和重量,孔的数量,和幼虫第一块,第一块总收益率和市场收益率第一块。在不同的管理措施中,蚊帐比控制措施能最大程度地减少虫害。在4个不同收获期,网兜处理的果实侵染率(以数量为基础)最高,分别为61.87%、73.27%、84.68%和92.70%。4个不同收收期,相同处理的侵染率(以重量为基础)最高,分别为61.38%、74.26%、88.41%和91.71%。小区1的孔数最少,4个不同收获期的孔数分别为5.00、8.00、15.33和8.67个。同种处理下,图1幼虫数最少,4个收获期幼虫数分别为2.00、2.33、3.67和3.00;苯甲酸埃维菌素处理地块的可售产量最高(33.95 t hm -1),效益成本比最高(1.46)。孟加拉国J. Agril。Res. 44(2): 339-353, 2019年6月
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intercropping of Jute as Leafy Vegetable With Hybrid Maize Under Different Planting Systems Effect of Soil Moisture Level and Nutrient Management on Yield, Bio-Chemical Properties and Water Productivity of Black Cumin Improvement of Brinjal-T. Aman -Cabbage Cropping Pattern in Tangail Region Evaluation of Betel Nut Germplasm in Barishal Region Effects of Different Chemical Treatments of Murta Cane (Schumannianthus Dichotomus L.) On the Quality of Shitalpati (Mat) In Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1