Now Is the Time! Exploring the Effects of Variations in the Timing of a Sustainable Design Educational Intervention

M. Alzayed, Elizabeth Starkey, Rohan Prabhu
{"title":"Now Is the Time! Exploring the Effects of Variations in the Timing of a Sustainable Design Educational Intervention","authors":"M. Alzayed, Elizabeth Starkey, Rohan Prabhu","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The accelerating depletion of natural resources has brought sustainability to the forefront and therefore, design educators must integrate sustainability into the engineering design curriculum. Several researchers have proposed educational interventions and design tools for sustainable design education. The timing of introducing such interventions, particularly in project-based courses, could influence the effectiveness of these interventions, and these effects remain largely unexplored. Our aim in this research is to investigate this research gap through a mixed-methods experiment conducted with first-year engineering design students. Specifically, we introduced a two-day module on sustainable design either in the first or sixth week of an 8-week long design project. The effects of this variation were compared by analyzing (1) changes in students’ trait empathy, (2) changes in their beliefs, attitudes, and intentions towards sustainability, and (3) their responses to a reflection assignment collected at the end of the semester/design project. From the results, we see that the timing of the sustainable design intervention did not influence changes in students’ trait empathy or their beliefs, attitudes, and intentions towards sustainability. However, students from both timing conditions reported significant increases in their attitudes and intentions towards sustainable action. Finally, students who received the intervention earlier more frequently mentioned the use of sustainable design heuristics in their reflection responses. Taken together, these findings suggest the need for educators to consider the timing of sustainable design interventions, especially when integrating them into longer project-based courses.","PeriodicalId":270086,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accelerating depletion of natural resources has brought sustainability to the forefront and therefore, design educators must integrate sustainability into the engineering design curriculum. Several researchers have proposed educational interventions and design tools for sustainable design education. The timing of introducing such interventions, particularly in project-based courses, could influence the effectiveness of these interventions, and these effects remain largely unexplored. Our aim in this research is to investigate this research gap through a mixed-methods experiment conducted with first-year engineering design students. Specifically, we introduced a two-day module on sustainable design either in the first or sixth week of an 8-week long design project. The effects of this variation were compared by analyzing (1) changes in students’ trait empathy, (2) changes in their beliefs, attitudes, and intentions towards sustainability, and (3) their responses to a reflection assignment collected at the end of the semester/design project. From the results, we see that the timing of the sustainable design intervention did not influence changes in students’ trait empathy or their beliefs, attitudes, and intentions towards sustainability. However, students from both timing conditions reported significant increases in their attitudes and intentions towards sustainable action. Finally, students who received the intervention earlier more frequently mentioned the use of sustainable design heuristics in their reflection responses. Taken together, these findings suggest the need for educators to consider the timing of sustainable design interventions, especially when integrating them into longer project-based courses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现在正是时候!探索可持续设计教育干预时间变化的影响
自然资源的加速枯竭将可持续性带到最前沿,因此,设计教育者必须将可持续性纳入工程设计课程。一些研究者提出了可持续设计教育的教育干预和设计工具。引入这种干预措施的时机,特别是在以项目为基础的课程中,可能会影响这些干预措施的有效性,而这些影响在很大程度上仍未得到探索。我们在这项研究中的目的是通过对一年级工程设计专业学生进行的混合方法实验来调查这一研究差距。具体来说,我们在为期8周的设计项目的第一周或第六周引入了为期两天的可持续设计模块。通过分析(1)学生共情特征的变化,(2)他们对可持续发展的信念、态度和意图的变化,以及(3)他们对学期末收集的反思作业/设计项目的反应,比较了这种变化的影响。从结果来看,我们发现可持续设计干预的时间并没有影响学生特质同理心的变化,也没有影响他们对可持续发展的信念、态度和意图。然而,两种时间条件下的学生都报告了他们对可持续行动的态度和意图的显著增加。最后,较早接受干预的学生在他们的反思反应中更频繁地提到可持续设计启发式的使用。综上所述,这些发现表明教育工作者需要考虑可持续设计干预的时机,特别是在将其整合到更长的基于项目的课程中时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teaching Machine Learning for Analysis and Design to Mechanical Engineering Students Let’s Role Play! the Impact of Video Frequency and Role Playing on the Utility of a Psychological Safety Team Intervention Examining a Trajectory of Complex System Design Processes: Airport Eco-System Case Studies by Novice Student Teams Evaluating the Effect of Project Frame on Communicative Patterns in Capstone Design Pitches Evaluation of Students’ Learning Through Reflection on Doing Based on Sentiment Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1