Fast Friends: A Quasi-Experimental Design Among Two Racially Diverse Student Populations

Stacy Vincent, Tiffany Monroe, Brett Wasden
{"title":"Fast Friends: A Quasi-Experimental Design Among Two Racially Diverse Student Populations","authors":"Stacy Vincent, Tiffany Monroe, Brett Wasden","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study sought to determine if the Fast Friend intervention (Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, & Bator, 1997) improves racial cognizance of cross-group dyads. Data were collected from freshmen (n=34) enrolled in a college of agriculture. The treatment and control groups included cross-group, same-sex, dyads composed of African American students and Caucasian students. In this quasi-experimental, nonequivalent comparison group, descriptive statistics revealed both the treatment and control participants failed to establish a difference between pretest/posttest and between control/treatment participants in the Implicit Theory of Intelligence Scale, Color Blind Racial Attitude Scale, and Communal Orientation Scale. However, results did indicate significance in the Collective Self-Esteem Scale among treatment group participants and control group participants over time. At the end of the study, a significant difference existed as treatment participants were more adaptive while the control was more maladaptive. Results indicate that engaged conversations among interracial groups over a short period of time does not have a large impact on cognizance, but makes substantial differences among perception of whom they feel comfortable talking to. Further research should be conducted to establish interventions that measure racial cognizance through longitudinal studies, cross-institutional studies, and an increased quantity of participants.","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study sought to determine if the Fast Friend intervention (Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, & Bator, 1997) improves racial cognizance of cross-group dyads. Data were collected from freshmen (n=34) enrolled in a college of agriculture. The treatment and control groups included cross-group, same-sex, dyads composed of African American students and Caucasian students. In this quasi-experimental, nonequivalent comparison group, descriptive statistics revealed both the treatment and control participants failed to establish a difference between pretest/posttest and between control/treatment participants in the Implicit Theory of Intelligence Scale, Color Blind Racial Attitude Scale, and Communal Orientation Scale. However, results did indicate significance in the Collective Self-Esteem Scale among treatment group participants and control group participants over time. At the end of the study, a significant difference existed as treatment participants were more adaptive while the control was more maladaptive. Results indicate that engaged conversations among interracial groups over a short period of time does not have a large impact on cognizance, but makes substantial differences among perception of whom they feel comfortable talking to. Further research should be conducted to establish interventions that measure racial cognizance through longitudinal studies, cross-institutional studies, and an increased quantity of participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快朋友:在两个不同种族的学生群体中的准实验设计
本探索性研究旨在确定“快朋友”干预(Aron, Melinat, Aron, Vallone, & Bator, 1997)是否能提高跨群体二人组的种族认知。数据收集自某农学院新生(n=34)。实验组和对照组包括跨组、同性组、非裔美国学生和白人学生组成的二人组。在准实验、非等效的对照组中,描述性统计结果显示实验组和对照组在内隐智力理论量表、色盲种族态度量表和社区取向量表上均未建立前测/后测差异和对照组/实验组之间的差异。然而,结果确实表明集体自尊量表在治疗组和对照组参与者之间具有显著性。在研究结束时,实验组的参与者更适应,而对照组的参与者更不适应,这是一个显著的差异。结果表明,跨种族群体在短时间内进行的对话对认知没有太大影响,但在与谁交谈时感到舒适的感知上存在实质性差异。应该进行进一步的研究,通过纵向研究、跨机构研究和增加参与者数量来确定衡量种族认知的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Influencing Students’ Decisions to Engage in International Education Opportunities Post-COVID Study Abroad Programs and Student Stress: An Animal Science Curriculum Case Study Cyberbiosecurity Workforce Preparation From Reel to Real: Practical Tips for Implementing Inductive Learning with Film Examining Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Flipped Introductory Agricultural Mechanics Course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1